Midwest Immunology Clinic, Plymouth, MN, USA.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2013 Aug;173(2):365-71. doi: 10.1111/cei.12099.
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single centre, capturing data on 173 primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) patients, including 40 obese patients, using subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin (Ig) (SCIG) (16 or 20%) delivered by infusion pump or subcutaneous (s.c.) rapid push. Patients previously using Ig administered as intravenous (i.v.) infusions (IVIG) were converted to SCIG dosing on a 1:1 basis. In both obese and non-obese patients, mean serum Ig levels were higher during SCIG administration (steady state) compared with IVIG administration (trough values). Similar SCIG dose : serum IgG level relationships were observed between obese and non-obese patients, suggesting the consistent bioavailability of SCIG regardless of body mass index (BMI). The mean SCIG volume per dosing site and the mean number of dosing days per week were greater with s.c. rapid push compared with infusion pump in this cohort, but the mean number of sites per infusion session was lower with s.c. rapid push. Both methods were well tolerated. The use of 20 versus 16% SCIG in obese patients improved dosing efficiency, resulting in smaller weekly volumes (54·7 versus 74·5 ml/week) and dosing on fewer days per week (2·3 versus 3·4 days). These data do not suggest a need for SCIG dosing adjustments in obese individuals relative to non-obese patients. The administration of SCIG using either infusion pump or s.c. rapid push is a practical and well-tolerated alternative to IVIG in obese patients. Offering various administration techniques provides a greater opportunity for treatment satisfaction and patient empowerment, which may support high levels of patient compliance.
在一家中心进行了回顾性图表审查,共纳入了 173 名原发性免疫缺陷病(PIDD)患者的数据,包括 40 名肥胖患者,这些患者通过输注泵或皮下(s.c.)快速推注施用皮下免疫球蛋白(Ig)(SCIG)(16%或 20%)。先前使用静脉内(i.v.)输注(IVIG)施用 Ig 的患者按照 1:1 的比例转换为 SCIG 剂量。在肥胖和非肥胖患者中,与 IVIG 给药(谷值)相比,SCIG 给药(稳态)时的平均血清 Ig 水平更高。肥胖和非肥胖患者之间观察到相似的 SCIG 剂量:血清 IgG 水平关系,表明 SCIG 的生物利用度一致,而与体重指数(BMI)无关。与输注泵相比,在该队列中,s.c.快速推注的每个给药部位的平均 SCIG 体积和每周给药天数更多,但 s.c.快速推注的每个输注疗程的平均给药部位更少。两种方法均耐受良好。在肥胖患者中使用 20%而非 16%的 SCIG 提高了给药效率,使每周体积更小(54.7 毫升/周对 74.5 毫升/周),每周给药天数更少(2.3 天对 3.4 天)。这些数据表明,与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者不需要调整 SCIG 剂量。与 IVIG 相比,使用输注泵或 s.c.快速推注施用 SCIG 是肥胖患者的一种实用且耐受良好的替代方法。提供各种给药技术为提高治疗满意度和患者赋权提供了更大的机会,这可能支持高水平的患者依从性。