• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定制出生体重模型:它们能否提高对高危婴儿的识别率?

Customised birthweight models: do they increase identification of at-risk infants?

作者信息

Gibbons Kristen, Chang Allan, Flenady Vicki, Mahomed Kassam, Gardener Glenn, Gray Peter H, Beckmann Michael, Rossouw Dominique

机构信息

Clinical Research Support Unit, Mater Medical Research Institute, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 May;49(5):380-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12189. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.12189
PMID:23607607
Abstract

AIM

The study aims to describe the cohort of women and babies who are classified as small-for-gestational age (SGA) at term by both an Australian customised birthweight model (CBM) and a commonly used population-based standard, and to investigate and compare the utility of these models in identifying babies at risk of experiencing adverse outcomes

METHODS

Routinely collected data on 54 890 singleton-term births at the Mater Mothers' Hospitals, Brisbane, with birthweight less than 4000 g between January 1997 and December 2008, was extracted. Each birth was classified as SGA (<10th centile) or not SGA by either and/or both methods: population-based standards (SGApop ) and CBM (SGAcust ). Babies classified as SGApop , SGAcust or SGAboth were compared with those not classified as SGA by both methods using relative risk and 95% confidence interval, and those only classified as SGAcust were compared with those only classified as SGApop . Maternal demographics, maternal risk factors for fetal growth restriction, pregnancy and labour complications and adverse neonatal outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 4768 (8.7%) births were classified as SGApop , while 6479 (11.8%) were SGAcust of whom 4138 (63.9%) were also classified as SGApop . Maternal risk factors such as smoking and hypertension were statistically higher for the SGAcust group when compared with SGApop . For the majority of adverse neonatal outcomes, a trend was noted to increased identification using the CBM.

CONCLUSION

The CBM provides a modest improvement when compared to a population-based standard to identity term infants at birth who are at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述根据澳大利亚定制出生体重模型(CBM)和常用的基于人群的标准在足月时被归类为小于胎龄儿(SGA)的女性和婴儿队列,并调查和比较这些模型在识别有不良结局风险婴儿方面的效用。

方法

提取了1997年1月至2008年12月在布里斯班马特母亲医院常规收集的54890例单胎足月分娩数据,这些婴儿出生体重小于4000克。每次分娩通过以下一种和/或两种方法分类为SGA(<第10百分位数)或非SGA:基于人群的标准(SGApop)和CBM(SGAcust)。使用相对风险和95%置信区间,将分类为SGApop、SGAcust或SGAboth的婴儿与未通过两种方法分类为SGA的婴儿进行比较,并将仅分类为SGAcust的婴儿与仅分类为SGApop的婴儿进行比较。报告了产妇人口统计学、胎儿生长受限的产妇风险因素、妊娠和分娩并发症以及不良新生儿结局。

结果

共有4768例(8.7%)分娩被分类为SGApop,而6479例(11.8%)为SGAcust,其中4138例(63.9%)也被分类为SGApop。与SGApop相比,SGAcust组的吸烟和高血压等产妇风险因素在统计学上更高。对于大多数不良新生儿结局,使用CBM发现有增加识别的趋势。

结论

与基于人群的标准相比,CBM在识别有不良新生儿结局风险的足月出生婴儿方面有适度改善。

相似文献

1
Customised birthweight models: do they increase identification of at-risk infants?定制出生体重模型:它们能否提高对高危婴儿的识别率?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 May;49(5):380-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12189. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
2
Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth.小胎龄儿妊娠围产儿不良结局风险:与胎儿生长的传统标准相比,定制标准。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823dc56e.
3
Customised birthweight centiles are useful for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies in women with type 2 diabetes.定制的出生体重百分位数对于识别2型糖尿病女性中的小于胎龄儿很有用。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Apr;49(2):180-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00975.x.
4
The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality.使用定制的与基于总体人群的出生体重标准预测围产期死亡率。
BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):474-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01273.x.
5
Comparison of perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age infants classified by population-based versus customised birth weight standards.基于人群的出生体重标准与定制出生体重标准分类的小于胎龄儿围产期结局比较。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Aug;52(4):348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01441.x. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
6
Should parity be included in customised fetal weight standards for identifying small-for-gestational-age babies? Results from a French multicentre study.在用于识别小于胎龄儿的定制胎儿体重标准中是否应纳入胎次?一项法国多中心研究的结果。
BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01855.x.
7
The impact of maternal celiac disease on birthweight and preterm birth: a Danish population-based cohort study.母体乳糜泻对出生体重和早产的影响:一项丹麦基于人群的队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):528-34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep409. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
8
Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction.定制的出生体重百分位数与胎盘相关的胎儿生长受限。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):409-416. doi: 10.1002/uog.23516.
9
Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?定制出生体重百分位数:调整孕产妇特征有意义吗?
BJOG. 2008 Oct;115(11):1397-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01870.x.
10
Maternal and pathological pregnancy characteristics in customised birthweight centiles and identification of at-risk small-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study.定制出生体重百分位数中的孕产妇和病理性妊娠特征,以及高危小于胎龄儿的识别:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2012 Jun;119(7):848-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03313.x. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional references vs. international standards for assessing weight and length by gestational age in Lithuanian neonates.立陶宛新生儿按胎龄评估体重和身长的区域参考标准与国际标准对比
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 14;11:1173685. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1173685. eCollection 2023.
2
Parity-Adjusted Term Neonatal Growth Chart Modifies Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification.经产次调整的足月新生儿生长图表改变了新生儿发病率和死亡率的风险分层。
J Clin Med. 2022 May 30;11(11):3097. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113097.
3
Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study.
胎儿生长与死产风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 22;11(4):e1001633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001633. eCollection 2014 Apr.
4
Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population.小胎龄儿的流行率及其死亡风险因选择的胎龄体重参考人群而异。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e92074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092074. eCollection 2014.