Suppr超能文献

非格司亭(优保津®)、生物类似药非格司亭(乐保津®)和来格司亭(格拉诺赛特®)作为自体造血干细胞移植一线外周血干细胞动员策略的比较:来自土耳其的单中心经验

The comparison of Filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) as a first line peripheral blood stem cell mobilization strategy in autologous hematopoieitic stem cell transplantation: a single center experience from Turkey.

作者信息

Sivgin Serdar, Karakus Esen, Kaynar Leylagul, Kurnaz Fatih, Pala Cigdem, Keklik Muzaffer, Zararsiz Gokmen, Solmaz Musa, Eser Bulent, Cetin Mustafa, Unal Ali

机构信息

Dedeman Stem Cell Transplantation Hospital, Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Jun;48(3):315-20. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND AIM

Patients affected by hematological malignancies can often benefit from high dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) transplantation. Different strategies have been used to mobilize an adequate number of PBSC, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy profile of different G-CSF agents including filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) on CD34(+) mobilization in patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data of patients who underwent autoHSCT diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and others. Data for stem cell mobilization has been obtained from patients' files. Patients who received Filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar Filgrastim (Leucostim®, Group) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) were evaluated mainly for total CD34(+) cell count at the end of mobilization procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients who underwent autoHSCT were retrospectively analyzed. 27 (28.2%) of the patients were female, and 69 (71.8%) were male. The diagnosis of the patients were; multiple myeloma (39 patients, 40.6%), Hodgkin Lyphoma (23 patients, 23.9%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (16 patients, 16.6%), and others (18 patients, 18.9%). The median number of leukapheresis cycle necessary to harvest a minimal count of 3×10(6) CD34(+)/kg was 2 in Neupogen® (min-max: 1-4) and Granocyte® (min-max: 1-3) groups and 1 (min-max: 1-2) in Leucostim® group. The median doses of G-CSF agents (μg/kg/day) in PBSC collection procedure were; 10.00 (min-max: 7.00-12.00) in the Neupogen® group, 8.00 (min-max: 7.25-9.00) in the Leucostim® group and 8.50 (6.00-9.50) in the Granocyte® group. There was no statistical significance among groups (p=0.067). The number of total collected PB CD34(+) cells (×10(6)/kg) was 7.64 (min-max: 4.09-13.86) in the Neupogen® group, 13.43 (min-max: 8.15-23.38) in the Leucostim® group and 5.45 (min-max: 4.28-9.40) in the Granocyte® group. The data showed that patients in the leucostim group had significantly higher PB CD34(+) cells compared to patients in the Granocyte® group (p=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Leucostim® was comparable to Neupogen® for PBSC mobilization in patients who underwent autoHSCT.

摘要

目的与目标

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者通常能从大剂量化疗后进行外周血干细胞(PBSC)移植中获益。已采用不同策略来动员足够数量的PBSC,包括单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)或化疗加G-CSF。在本研究中,我们旨在比较不同G-CSF制剂(包括非格司亭(Neupogen®)、生物类似物非格司亭(Leucostim®)和来格司亭(Granocyte®))对接受自体造血干细胞移植(autoHSCT)患者的CD34(+)动员效果。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了诊断为多发性骨髓瘤(MM)、霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)、非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)及其他疾病并接受autoHSCT患者的数据。干细胞动员数据来自患者病历。主要评估接受非格司亭(Neupogen®)、生物类似物非格司亭(Leucostim®组)和来格司亭(Granocyte®)的患者在动员程序结束时的总CD34(+)细胞计数。

结果

共回顾性分析了96例接受autoHSCT的患者。其中27例(28.2%)为女性,69例(71.8%)为男性。患者诊断情况为:多发性骨髓瘤(39例,40.6%)、霍奇金淋巴瘤(23例,23.9%)、非霍奇金淋巴瘤(16例,16.6%)及其他(18例,18.9%)。在Neupogen®组(最小值 - 最大值:1 - 4)和Granocyte®组(最小值 - 最大值:1 - 3)中,采集最低计数为3×10(6) CD34(+)/kg所需的白细胞分离术周期中位数为2,而在Leucostim®组中为1(最小值 - 最大值:1 - 2)。PBSC采集过程中G-CSF制剂的中位剂量(μg/kg/天)分别为:Neupogen®组10.00(最小值 - 最大值:7.00 - 12.00)、Leucostim®组8.00(最小值 - 最大值:7.25 - 9.00)、Granocyte®组8.50(6.00 - 9.50)。各组间无统计学意义(p = 0.067)。Neupogen®组采集的外周血CD34(+)细胞总数(×10(6)/kg)为7.64(最小值 - 最大值:4.09 - 13.86),Leucostim®组为13.43(最小值 - 最大值:8.15 - 23.38),Granocyte®组为5.45(最小值 - 最大值:4.28 - 9.40)。数据显示,Leucostim®组患者的外周血CD34(+)细胞明显高于Granocyte®组患者(p = 0.013)。

结论

在接受autoHSCT的患者中,Leucostim®在PBSC动员方面与Neupogen®相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验