Suppr超能文献

血清麦醇溶蛋白监测可从激发试验诊断小麦依赖运动诱发过敏反应中筛选出假阴性结果的患者。

Serum gliadin monitoring extracts patients with false negative results in challenge tests for the diagnosis of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan.

出版信息

Allergol Int. 2013 Jun;62(2):229-38. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.12-OA-0495. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Challenge testing with wheat plus exercise and/or aspirin is a gold standard for the diagnosis of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA); however, the test may often yield false-negative results. Our previous study suggested that an increase in serum wheat gliadin levels is required to induce allergic symptoms in patients with WDEIA. Based on this knowledge, we sought to extract the patients with false negative results in the challenge tests of WDEIA.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with suspected WDEIA were enrolled. First, group categorizations-Group I, challenge tests were positive; Group II, challenge tests were negative and serum gliadin were undetectable; Group III, challenge tests were negative and serum gliadin were detectable-were given according to the results of wheat plus exercise and/or aspirin challenge testing and serum gliadin levels. Second, diagnoses were made using retests and/or dietary management in Group II and III.

RESULTS

Positive results for wheat plus exercise and/or aspirin challenge tests gave a diagnosis of definite WDEIA in 17 of 36 patients (Group I). Of the remaining 19 challenge negative patients, serum gliadin was undetectable in ten patients (Group II). Of the ten patients (Group II), three of them were diagnosed as definite WDEIA by retesting and six of them were diagnosed as probable WDEIA using a wheat elimination diet, whereas one patient was non-WDEIA. In the rest of the nine challenge negative patients, serum gliadin was detectable (Group III). No allergic episodes with a normal diet provided a diagnosis of non-WDEIA in seven of the nine patients, whereas the remaining two patients were probable WDEIA or had another food allergy because of repeated episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that serum gliadin monitoring during challenge testing is useful.

摘要

背景

小麦加运动和/或阿司匹林激发试验是诊断小麦依赖运动诱发的过敏反应(WDEIA)的金标准;然而,该试验常常产生假阴性结果。我们之前的研究表明,血清麦醇溶蛋白水平升高是诱导 WDEIA 患者发生过敏症状所必需的。基于这一知识,我们试图从 WDEIA 的激发试验中提取假阴性结果的患者。

方法

纳入 36 例疑似 WDEIA 的患者。首先,根据小麦加运动和/或阿司匹林激发试验及血清麦醇溶蛋白水平的结果,将患者分为三组:I 组,激发试验阳性;II 组,激发试验阴性且血清麦醇溶蛋白不可检测;III 组,激发试验阴性且血清麦醇溶蛋白可检测。其次,对 II 组和 III 组患者进行复测和/或饮食管理以明确诊断。

结果

36 例患者中,17 例(I 组)小麦加运动和/或阿司匹林激发试验阳性,被诊断为明确的 WDEIA。在其余 19 例激发试验阴性的患者中,有 10 例(II 组)血清麦醇溶蛋白不可检测。这 10 例患者中,有 3 例经复测被诊断为明确的 WDEIA,6 例经小麦排除饮食被诊断为可能的 WDEIA,1 例被诊断为非 WDEIA。其余 9 例激发试验阴性且血清麦醇溶蛋白可检测的患者(III 组)中,有 7 例正常饮食无过敏发作,被诊断为非 WDEIA,9 例中有 2 例因反复发作被诊断为可能的 WDEIA 或有其他食物过敏。

结论

本研究表明,在激发试验期间监测血清麦醇溶蛋白是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验