Cardiovascular Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2013 Mar;43(3):199-203. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.3.199. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
Ergonovine provocation test is known to be very sensitive for diagnosing variant angina. The patient described in this study initially presented with atypical chest pain and underwent coronary angiography and ergonovine provocation tests, which were negative. The patient was subsequently prescribed a proton pump inhibitor and prokinetics for pain relief, but then presented with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock due to coronary artery vasospasm 5 years later. This case suggests that ergonovine provocation test generates false negative results, which can lead to unwanted outcomes. Even with a negative ergonovine provocation test, prescription of calcium channel blockers or nitrates should be considered in patients with a clinical history suggestive of variant angina.
麦角新碱激发试验对诊断变异型心绞痛非常敏感。本研究中描述的患者最初表现为非典型胸痛,行冠状动脉造影和麦角新碱激发试验均为阴性。随后给予质子泵抑制剂和促动力药缓解疼痛,但 5 年后因冠状动脉痉挛导致急性心肌梗死和心源性休克。本病例提示麦角新碱激发试验可产生假阴性结果,导致不良后果。即使麦角新碱激发试验为阴性,对于有变异型心绞痛临床病史的患者,仍应考虑使用钙通道阻滞剂或硝酸酯类药物。