Singh Simone Rauscher
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor Michigan, USA.
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Spring;39(3):32-41.
Assessing the adequacy of the community benefits that not-for-profit hospitals provide in exchange for tax exemption remains a challenge. While recent changes to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting requirements have improved transparency, the lack of clearly defined charitable expectations has resulted in critical scrutiny of not-for-profit hospitals' community benefits and numerous challenges to their tax exempt status. Using data from the revised IRS Form 990 Schedule H for 2009, this article documents the wide range of community benefit activities that not-for-profit hospitals in California engage in and compares them to a set of minimum spending thresholds. The findings show that when community benefit was defined narrowly in terms of charity care, very few hospitals would have met any of the minimum spending thresholds. When community benefit was defined as in the revised IRS Form 990 Schedule H, however, a majority of hospitals in California would have been considered charitable. Whether focusing on expenditures is the most appropriate way to assess the adequacy of a hospital's community benefits remains an open question. To that end, this article concludes by outlining a more comprehensive evaluation approach that builds on recent changes to non-profit hospital tax exemption implemented by the Affordable Care Act.
评估非营利性医院为换取免税而提供的社区福利是否充足仍然是一项挑战。尽管美国国税局(IRS)报告要求最近的变化提高了透明度,但缺乏明确界定的慈善期望导致对非营利性医院社区福利的严格审查,并对其免税地位提出了诸多质疑。本文利用2009年修订后的IRS 990表H的数据,记录了加利福尼亚州非营利性医院开展的广泛社区福利活动,并将其与一系列最低支出门槛进行了比较。研究结果表明,若将社区福利狭义地定义为慈善护理,很少有医院能达到任何一项最低支出门槛。然而,若按照修订后的IRS 990表H来定义社区福利,加利福尼亚州的大多数医院都将被视为具有慈善性质。关注支出是否是评估医院社区福利充足性的最合适方式仍是一个悬而未决的问题。为此,本文最后概述了一种更全面的评估方法,该方法基于《平价医疗法案》对非营利性医院免税政策的最新调整。