Christopher W. Goodman and Allan S. Brett are with the Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia. Amber Flanigan is with AccessHealth, Prisma Health, Columbia. Janice C. Probst is with the Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Apr;110(4):492-498. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305522. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
To examine content of financial assistance polices (FAPs) among US tax-exempt hospitals and determine whether restrictive policies were associated with reduced charity care spending. Using hospital tax filings with the Internal Revenue Service in 2016 and FAPs obtained from hospital Web sites, we examined characteristics of FAPs and associated expenditures for charity care in a representative sample of 170 tax-exempt hospitals. We identified common eligibility requirements and used them to define restrictiveness of FAPs. FAPs were characterized by various ways to exclude patients, a patchwork of coverage for typical health care services, and wide-ranging discounts. FAP expenditures were lowest among restrictive hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act and highest among nonrestrictive hospitals in nonexpansion states. FAP expenses did not differ by hospital restrictiveness alone. Standardizing common eligibility requirements among FAPs carries potential benefits with regard to optimizing charity care for community benefit and achieving at least some level of equity; however, further policy efforts must account for additional restrictions, charges, and exclusions to be effective.
为了研究美国免税医院的财务援助政策(FAP)的内容,并确定限制性政策是否与慈善医疗支出的减少有关。我们使用了 2016 年医院向国内税务局提交的纳税申报单和从医院网站获得的 FAP,在 170 家免税医院的代表性样本中检查了 FAP 的特征以及与慈善医疗相关的支出。我们确定了常见的资格要求,并使用这些要求来定义 FAP 的限制性。FAP 有各种排除患者的方法,通常的医疗服务覆盖范围各不相同,折扣幅度也很大。在作为平价医疗法案的一部分扩大医疗补助的州,限制性医院的 FAP 支出最低,而非扩张州的非限制性医院的 FAP 支出最高。仅从医院的限制性来看,FAP 支出并没有差异。在 FAP 中统一常见的资格要求可能会带来优化社区福利的慈善医疗和实现至少一定程度公平的潜在好处;但是,进一步的政策努力必须考虑到其他限制、收费和排除,以确保政策有效。