Suppr超能文献

外倒转术的镇痛/麻醉。

Analgesia/anesthesia for external cephalic version.

机构信息

Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;26(3):278-87. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360f64e.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Professional society guidelines recommend that women with breech presentation be delivered surgically due to a higher incidence of fetal risks compared with vaginal delivery. An alternative is attempted external cephalic version, which if successful, enables attempted vaginal delivery. Attitudes towards external cephalic version (ECV) will be considered in this review, along with pain relief methods and their impact on ECV success rates.

RECENT FINDINGS

Articles suggest that ECV is infrequently offered, due to both physician and patient factors. Success of ECV is higher in multiparous women, complete breech, posterior placenta, or smaller fetus. Preterm ECV performance does not increase vaginal delivery rates. Neuraxial techniques (spinal or epidural) significantly increase ECV success rates, as do moxibustion and hypnosis. Four reviews summarized studies considering ECV and neuraxial techniques. These reviews suggest that neuraxial techniques using high (surgical) doses of local anesthetic are efficacious compared with control groups not using anesthesia, whereas techniques using low-doses are not. Low-dose versus high-dose neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia has not been directly compared in a single study. Based on currently available data, the rate of cephalic presentation is not increased using neuraxial techniques, but vaginal delivery rates are higher. ECV appears to be a low-risk procedure.

SUMMARY

The logistics of routine ECV and provision of optimal neuraxial techniques for successful ECV require additional research. Safety aspects of neuraxial anesthesia for ECV require further investigation.

摘要

目的综述

专业学会指南建议臀位分娩行剖宫产,因为与阴道分娩相比,胎儿风险更高。另一种选择是尝试外倒转术,如果成功,可尝试阴道分娩。本综述将考虑对外倒转术(ECV)的态度,以及缓解疼痛的方法及其对 ECV 成功率的影响。

最新发现

文章表明,由于医生和患者两方面的原因,ECV 很少被采用。经产妇、完全臀位、后位胎盘或胎儿较小者 ECV 成功率更高。未足月行 ECV 并不能提高阴道分娩率。椎管内技术(脊髓或硬膜外)显著提高 ECV 成功率,艾灸和催眠也有帮助。四项综述总结了考虑 ECV 和椎管内技术的研究。这些综述表明,与不使用麻醉的对照组相比,使用高(手术)剂量局部麻醉的椎管内技术更有效,而使用低剂量的则不然。在一项单独的研究中,尚未直接比较低剂量与高剂量椎管内镇痛/麻醉。根据目前可用的数据,使用椎管内技术并不会增加头位的发生率,但阴道分娩率更高。ECV 似乎是一种低风险的手术。

总结

常规 ECV 的实施和为成功 ECV 提供最佳椎管内技术的后勤工作需要进一步研究。ECV 椎管内麻醉的安全性方面需要进一步调查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验