Suppr超能文献

立体定向体部放疗:容积旋转调强弧形治疗与三维非共面适形放疗治疗早期肺癌的比较。

Stereotactic body radiotherapy: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus 3D non-coplanar conformal radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6 Canada.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Dec;12(6):511-6. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500338. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early stage lung cancer. Treatment duration can be >30 minutes per fraction with non-coplanar 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Whilst this is generally well tolerated, faster delivery techniques are desirable. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for fast delivery of radiation treatment. The purpose of this planning study was to compare SBRT with 3D-CRT and VMAT, with VMAT plans generated using both single arc and 3 non-coplanar partial arcs. Ten patients who previously underwent SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions) with 3D-CRT were selected. VMAT plans were generated to treat the PTV while limiting doses to organs at risk. Cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were compared between the 3 techniques using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test. Treatment delivery time was also assessed. Both VMAT techniques covered target volumes more conformally than 3D-CRT with a mean V48/VPTV of 1.21 for 3D-CRT, 1.03 for 3 arc plans and 1.01 for single arc plans (p = 0.005). Dose constraints to organs at risk were met using all three techniques. Mean lung doses were 2.93 Gy for 3D-CRT, 2.87 Gy for single arc and 2.73 Gy for the 3 arc technique (3-arc vs. 3D-CRT: p = 0.009). Lung V20 for 3D-CRT, 1 arc and 3 arcs were 3.24%, 2.89% and 2.73%, respectively (3 arc vs. 3D-CRT: p = 0.028). Mean time to deliver a single fraction was 13 minutes for 3D-CRT, 9.2 minutes for 3 arcs and 5.5 minutes for 1 arc. VMAT resulted in improved conformality compared to 3D-CRT. The 3 arc technique appears to have the lowest dose to lung although the magnitude is unlikely to be clinically significant. The main advantage of VMAT over 3D-CRT is faster treatment delivery time. Shortened treatment times are anticipated to improve tolerability of this treatment and reduce the chance of error due to intra-fraction motion.

摘要

立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)是早期肺癌患者的一种治疗选择。非共面 3D 适形放疗(3D-CRT)的分次治疗时间可超过 30 分钟。虽然一般来说患者都能耐受,但更快的治疗递送技术是可取的。容积旋转调强弧形治疗(VMAT)可实现快速的放射治疗。本研究的目的是比较 SBRT 与 3D-CRT 和 VMAT,VMAT 计划分别使用单弧和 3 个非共面部分弧生成。选择了 10 名先前接受过 3D-CRT(48Gy 分 4 次)治疗的 SBRT 患者。生成 VMAT 计划以治疗 PTV,同时限制危及器官的剂量。使用 Wilcoxon 配对检验比较 3 种技术的累积剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数。还评估了治疗递送时间。两种 VMAT 技术比 3D-CRT 更适形地覆盖靶区,3D-CRT 的平均 V48/VPTV 为 1.21,3 个弧计划为 1.03,单弧计划为 1.01(p=0.005)。所有三种技术都满足了危及器官的剂量限制。平均肺剂量为 3D-CRT 为 2.93Gy,单弧为 2.87Gy,3 弧技术为 2.73Gy(3 弧与 3D-CRT:p=0.009)。3D-CRT、单弧和 3 个弧的肺 V20 分别为 3.24%、2.89%和 2.73%(3 弧与 3D-CRT:p=0.028)。单次分割的平均治疗时间为 3D-CRT 为 13 分钟,3 个弧为 9.2 分钟,单弧为 5.5 分钟。与 3D-CRT 相比,VMAT 具有更好的适形性。尽管 3 弧技术似乎对肺的剂量最低,但幅度不太可能具有临床意义。VMAT 相对于 3D-CRT 的主要优势是治疗递送时间更快。预计缩短治疗时间将提高这种治疗的耐受性,并降低因分次内运动而导致的错误的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验