• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术医院病历记录审核(SHARK)——一种改进手术病历记录的新审核工具。

Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.

机构信息

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2013 May-Jun;70(3):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.003
PMID:23618448
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate and legible record keeping is a crucial part of good medical practice. Surgical Hospital Audit of Record Keeping (SHARK) is a new audit and teaching tool for junior doctors. The author has designed the tool, based on the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines, to anonymously score the different surgical teams' medical records within a hospital. It takes into account regular record keeping during ward rounds, together with the operation note and admission clerking.

METHODS

The SHARK audit tool assesses 45 individual areas within surgical records. Fifteen points are apportioned for an initial surgical clerking, 13 for a subsequent record entry, and 17 for the operation note to give an overall score out of 45. It was implemented at 2 hospitals and used to educate medical students.

RESULTS

The results were poor and improved with education at both sites. There was 80% total agreement with a κ coefficient for interobserver reliability of 0.6.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the SHARK tool is simple to use, repeatable, and reliable in improving record keeping.

摘要

简介

准确、清晰的记录保存是良好医疗实践的关键部分。《外科医院记录审核(SHARK)》是一种新的审计和教学工具,适用于初级医生。作者根据皇家外科学院的指南设计了该工具,旨在对医院内的不同外科团队的病历进行匿名评分。它考虑了在病房查房期间的常规记录保存,以及手术记录和入院记录。

方法

SHARK 审核工具评估了外科记录中的 45 个单独区域。初始手术记录分配 15 分,随后的记录条目分配 13 分,手术记录分配 17 分,总分为 45 分。该工具在 2 家医院实施,并用于教育医学生。

结果

在这两个地点,经过教育后,结果有所改善,但仍不理想。总体上有 80%的一致性,观察者间可靠性的κ系数为 0.6。

结论

这项研究表明,SHARK 工具简单易用,可重复使用,并且在改善记录保存方面可靠。

相似文献

1
Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.手术医院病历记录审核(SHARK)——一种改进手术病历记录的新审核工具。
J Surg Educ. 2013 May-Jun;70(3):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.12.003.
2
Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.使用CRABEL评分来提高手术病例记录质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Nov;87(6):454-7. doi: 10.1308/003588405X60687.
3
Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.澄清事实——对外科科室病例记录质量的前瞻性审计
S Afr J Surg. 2007 Aug;45(3):92, 94-5.
4
An audit of medical record-keeping in maxillofacial surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan using the CRABEL Scoring system.使用CRABEL评分系统对伊巴丹大学学院医院颌面外科的病历记录进行审核。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2006 Mar;35(1):93-5.
5
The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.CRABEL评分——颌面医疗记录的设定标准
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jun;42(3):200-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.01.013.
6
Quality of clinical notes for vascular surgery admissions: a CRABEL score review.血管外科住院病历的质量:CRABEL评分回顾
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jul;79(7-8):539-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04986.x.
7
Inadequacies of hospital medical records.医院病历的不足之处。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Jan;75(1 Suppl):7-9.
8
The ANKLe score: an audit of otolaryngology emergency clinic record keeping.ANKLe评分:耳鼻喉科急诊诊所病历记录审核
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Apr;90(3):231-4. doi: 10.1308/003588408X261537.
9
An audit of basic record keeping standards: lessons learnt from the Royal College of Physicians.基本记录保存标准审计:从皇家内科医师学院汲取的经验教训
Med Sci Law. 2008 Apr;48(2):155-8. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.48.2.155.
10
An audit of operative notes: facts and ways to improve.手术记录审核:事实与改进方法
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Sep;78(9):800-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04654.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the quality of oral squamous cell carcinoma clinical records in oral surgery with Surgical Tool for Auditing Records (STAR) scoring.应用记录审核工具(STAR)评分评估口腔颌面外科口腔鳞状细胞癌临床记录的质量。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04811-8.
2
CRABEL Score Assessment for Oral Surgery Excision Biopsy Case Notes of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌口腔外科切除活检病例记录的CRABEL评分评估
Cureus. 2024 Apr 1;16(4):e57394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57394. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Initiative to improve quality of paediatric ward-round documentation by application of 'SOAP' format.
应用“SOAP”格式提高儿科病房查房记录质量的举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001472.
4
The Value of Auditing Surgical Records in a Tertiary Hospital Setting.三级医院环境下外科手术记录审核的价值
Cureus. 2022 Jan 10;14(1):e21066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21066. eCollection 2022 Jan.