Obesity and Digestive Disease Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Tlalpan, Mexico.
Ann Hepatol. 2013 May-Jun;12(3):416-24.
Background. The incidence of liver cirrhosis is significantly high in Latin population. The high prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease NAFLD is likely partially responsible for these figures. Liver biopsy is not a practical diagnostic option in this scenario. The validation of noninvasive markers of fibrosis is important in populations with a high prevalence of NAFLD. Aim. To compare the diagnostic value of noninvasive assessment systems to detect fibrosis in a cohort of Latin patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Material and methods. Patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were included. Noninvasive evaluations included calculations of NAFLD fibrosis, FIB-4, BARD scores, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated. Results. A total of 228 patients (mean age, 48.6 ± 12.7 years) were included. Fifty-one percent were women; 48% were overweight and 23% were obese. The severity of fibrosis was classified as G0, 56.6%; G1, 25%; G2, 6.6%; G3, 7%; and G4, 4.8%. The AUROC values for advanced fibrosis were 0.72 for the NAFLD fibrosis score, 0.74 for FIB-4 score, 0.67 for AST/ALT ratio, 0.66 for APRI score, and 0.65 for BARD score. In 54% of patients with undetermined FIB-4 score and in 60% of patients with undetermined NAFLD fibrosis score, fibrosis was observed in the liver biopsy. Conclusions. The NAFLD fibrosis, FIB-4, and APRI scores can be used for the noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis. However, 25% of patients evaluated by these methods have an indeterminate degree of fibrosis.
拉丁人群中肝硬化的发病率显著较高。非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的高患病率可能在一定程度上导致了这一数据。在这种情况下,肝活检不是一种实际的诊断选择。在 NAFLD 患病率较高的人群中,验证纤维化的非侵入性标志物非常重要。目的:比较非侵入性评估系统在经肝活检证实的拉丁裔 NAFLD 患者队列中检测纤维化的诊断价值。材料和方法:纳入经肝活检证实的 NAFLD 患者。非侵入性评估包括计算非酒精性脂肪性肝病纤维化、FIB-4、BARD 评分、APRI 和 AST/ALT 比值。计算了灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和接受者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)。结果:共纳入 228 例患者(平均年龄 48.6±12.7 岁)。51%为女性;48%超重,23%肥胖。纤维化严重程度分为 G0 级 56.6%;G1 级 25%;G2 级 6.6%;G3 级 7%;G4 级 4.8%。NAFLD 纤维化评分、FIB-4 评分、AST/ALT 比值、APRI 评分和 BARD 评分对晚期纤维化的 AUROC 值分别为 0.72、0.74、0.67、0.66 和 0.65。在 54%不确定 FIB-4 评分和 60%不确定 NAFLD 纤维化评分的患者中,在肝活检中观察到纤维化。结论:NAFLD 纤维化、FIB-4 和 APRI 评分可用于纤维化的非侵入性诊断。然而,用这些方法评估的 25%患者的纤维化程度不确定。