Suppr超能文献

优化抗真菌药物的选择和管理。

Optimizing antifungal choice and administration.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Apr;29 Suppl 4:13-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.761135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The antifungal armamentarium includes a number of drug classes and agents within each class. Successful IFI management depends on optimal matching of drug choice with the individual patient and causative pathogen, and maximizing effectiveness of the selected drug through appropriate dosing and toxicity management.

OBJECTIVE

This review is intended to provide a brief overview of key factors involved in optimizing antifungal choice and administration for patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs).

FINDINGS

Antifungals differ in spectrum of activity, and these differences are critical when selecting the antifungal most likely to provide success for a patient with an IFI. When the species has not yet been identified, an analysis of regional epidemiology and risk factors can provide clues as to the most likely pathogen. For severely immunocompromised patients, a fungicidal agent may be preferred over a fungistatic agent, although more research is needed in this area. Triazoles, particularly itraconazole and posaconazole, exhibit great interpatient pharmacokinetic variability related to absorption. Steps can be taken to maximize absorption when using these agents. Voriconazole concentration is affected by polymorphisms in the major metabolic enzyme, cytochrome P450 2C19. Triazoles, and to a lesser extent other antifungals, are also subject to drug-drug interactions, which needs to be considered when selecting a particular antifungal agent for use in a severely ill patient on polypharmacy. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful adjunct for patients receiving itraconazole, voriconazole, or posaconazole. When the IFI involves a pharmacologically protected site, such as the central nervous system (CNS) or eye, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, or voriconazole are generally preferred. Echinocandin penetration is typically inadequate for IFIs of the CNS or eye. Antifungal agents also differ in their toxicity profiles, and these issues also need to be considered and managed when making an antifungal choice.

CONCLUSION

Successful management of IFIs relies in part on the accurate selection of an antifungal agent for the infection. Drug characteristics can help in the selection of drug therapy. These characteristics include the drug's spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicity profile, and distribution to the infection site. Matching the drug profile to the patient and fungal species contribute to optimal management of infection.

摘要

背景

抗真菌药物包括许多药物类别和每个类别中的药物。成功管理侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)取决于将药物选择与个体患者和致病病原体最佳匹配,并通过适当的剂量和毒性管理最大限度地提高所选药物的有效性。

目的

本综述旨在简要概述优化侵袭性真菌感染患者抗真菌药物选择和给药的关键因素。

发现

抗真菌药物在作用谱上有所不同,在选择最有可能使IFI 患者成功的抗真菌药物时,这些差异至关重要。当尚未确定物种时,对区域流行病学和危险因素的分析可以提供有关最可能病原体的线索。对于严重免疫功能低下的患者,杀菌剂可能优于抑菌剂,尽管在这方面需要更多的研究。三唑类药物,特别是伊曲康唑和泊沙康唑,与吸收相关的个体间药代动力学变异性很大。在使用这些药物时,可以采取措施最大限度地提高吸收。伏立康唑的浓度受到主要代谢酶细胞色素 P450 2C19 多态性的影响。三唑类药物,以及在较小程度上的其他抗真菌药物,也受到药物相互作用的影响,在为患有多种药物治疗的重病患者选择特定的抗真菌药物时需要考虑这一点。治疗药物监测可能是接受伊曲康唑、伏立康唑或泊沙康唑治疗的患者的有用辅助手段。当IFI 涉及药理学保护部位,如中枢神经系统(CNS)或眼睛时,通常首选 5-氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑或伏立康唑。棘白菌素类药物的渗透通常不足以治疗 CNS 或眼部的 IFI。抗真菌药物在毒性特征上也存在差异,在选择抗真菌药物时也需要考虑和管理这些问题。

结论

IFI 的成功管理部分依赖于准确选择针对感染的抗真菌药物。药物特性有助于选择药物治疗。这些特征包括药物的作用谱、药代动力学、药效学、毒性特征和感染部位的分布。将药物特征与患者和真菌物种相匹配有助于优化感染的管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验