Suppr超能文献

微创经皮跨肌间隙短节段椎弓根内固定术治疗无神经损伤的胸腰椎单节段椎体骨折的效果。

Effects of minimally invasive percutaneous and trans-spatium intermuscular short-segment pedicle instrumentation on thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fractures without neurological compromise.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai First People Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 100 Haining Road, 200080 Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Jun;99(4):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous short-segment pedicle instrumentation (SSPI) with that of trans-spatium intermuscular SSPI on thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fracture without neurological compromise.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fracture without neurological deficit receiving treatment between January 2009 and July 2011 were enrolled. Percutaneous SSPI was performed for 18 patients (the percutaneous group), and trans-spatium intermuscular SSPI was performed for 21 patients (the trans-spatium intermuscular group). Peroperative indices, intraoperative radiation exposure time, postoperative and follow-up lumbodorsal pain, function scores, and radiological data were compared.

RESULTS

The percutaneous group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and less severe postoperative pains, but suffered significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher hospitalization costs compared with the trans-spatium intermuscular group. No significant difference was observed in operating time. All patients were followed up for 17.3 ± 9.2 months (ranging from 5 to 35 months). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative relative vertebral height (RVH) and regional kyphotic angle (RKA), as well as last follow-up RVH, RKA, lumbodorsal pain, and Oswestry disability index.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous SSPI has the virtues of less intraoperative blood loss and less severe pains in the treatment of thoracolumbar mono-segmental vertebral fracture without neurological deficit. When compared with trans-spatium intermuscular SSPI, it results in longer intraoperative radiation exposure time and a higher surgery cost. To us, percutaneous SSPI has no advantage over trans-spatium intermuscular SSPI in therapeutic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Retrospective study.

摘要

目的

比较微创经皮短节段椎弓根固定术(SSPI)与经肌间隙 SSPI 治疗无神经损伤的胸腰椎单节段椎体骨折的疗效。

方法

选择 2009 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月收治的无神经损伤的胸腰椎单节段椎体骨折患者 39 例,行微创经皮 SSPI 治疗 18 例(微创组),经肌间隙 SSPI 治疗 21 例(经肌间隙组)。比较两组患者的围手术期指标、术中透视时间、术后及随访腰背疼痛、功能评分及影像学资料。

结果

微创组术中出血量较少,术后疼痛较轻,但透视时间较长,住院费用较高,手术时间与经肌间隙组差异无统计学意义。所有患者均获得随访,随访时间为 17.3±9.2 个月(5~35 个月)。两组术后伤椎相对高度(RVH)、局部后凸角(RKA)及末次随访时的 RVH、RKA、腰背疼痛、Oswestry 功能障碍指数差异均无统计学意义。

结论

微创经皮 SSPI 治疗无神经损伤的胸腰椎单节段椎体骨折具有术中出血量少、疼痛轻的优点,但术中透视时间长、手术费用高。与经肌间隙 SSPI 相比,微创经皮 SSPI 在治疗效果方面无优势。

证据水平

IV 级,回顾性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验