Suppr超能文献

经皮与传统开放入路治疗无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折:35 项队列研究的荟萃分析。

Percutaneous versus traditional open approaches for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures in patients without neurologic deficits: a meta-analysis of 35 cohort studies.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421000, Hunan, China.

Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jan 24;47(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02259-y.

Abstract

At present, percutaneous surgery is widely used to treat thoracolumbar fractures. However, the actual safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of percutaneous surgery are not clear. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the efficacies of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and open pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without nerve root symptoms. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries for articles published on or before June 2023. All results were evaluated by standard methods recommended for meta-analysis, continuous data were expressed by standard mean differences (SMDs), and binary variables were analyzed by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We also explored the main sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results through sensitivity analysis, Begg's funnel plots, and Egger's test. Thirty-five cohort studies with a total of 3039 patients were included. The study found that patients who undergo percutaneous approaches have less intraoperative blood loss (IBL), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS), shorter operation time, and shorter incision. Moreover, percutaneous approaches had more advantages in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and infection rates. However, there was no significant difference in anterior vertebral body height (AVB), Cobb angle (CA), or screw errors between the two groups. In the long run, the clinical and surgical results of the percutaneous approach are better than those of the open approach, but the radiological results of both operations do not seem to show an advantage for any specific approach. Because of publication bias and heterogeneity, our findings must be interpreted with caution. However, this paper will provide some support for clinicians to choose suitable surgical methods for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

摘要

目前,经皮手术广泛应用于胸腰椎骨折的治疗。然而,经皮手术的实际安全性、可行性和有效性尚不清楚。通过系统评价和荟萃分析,我们比较了经皮椎弓根螺钉固定和开放椎弓根螺钉固定治疗无神经根症状的胸腰椎骨折的疗效。我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中截至 2023 年 6 月发表的文章。所有结果均采用荟萃分析推荐的标准方法进行评估,连续数据采用标准化均数差(SMD)表示,二分类变量采用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)表示。我们还通过敏感性分析、Begg 漏斗图和 Egger 检验探讨了异质性的主要来源和结果的稳定性。共纳入 35 项队列研究,共计 3039 例患者。研究发现,经皮入路患者术中出血量(IBL)更少、住院时间(LOS)更短、手术时间和切口更短。此外,经皮入路在视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分和感染率方面具有更多优势。然而,两组患者的前椎体高度(AVB)、Cobb 角(CA)和螺钉误差无显著差异。从长远来看,经皮入路的临床和手术效果优于开放入路,但两种手术的影像学结果似乎都没有显示出任何特定入路的优势。由于发表偏倚和异质性,我们的研究结果必须谨慎解释。然而,本文将为临床医生选择治疗胸腰椎骨折的合适手术方法提供一些支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验