Suppr超能文献

持续使用华法林与围手术期使用达比加群以降低接受房颤或左房扑动导管消融术患者的中风和全身性栓塞发生率

Continuous warfarin versus periprocedural dabigatran to reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter.

作者信息

Kaiser Daniel W, Streur Megan M, Nagarakanti Rangadham, Whalen S Patrick, Ellis Christopher R

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Sep;37(3):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9793-7. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Left atrial catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires periprocedural anticoagulation to minimize thromboembolic complications. High rates of major bleeding complications using dabigatran etexilate for periprocedural anticoagulation have been reported, raising concerns regarding its safety during left atrial catheter ablation. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a dabigatran use strategy versus warfarin, at a single high-volume AF ablation center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on consecutive patients undergoing left atrial ablation at Vanderbilt Medical Center from January 2011 through August 2012 with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Patient cohorts were divided into two groups, those utilizing dabigatran etexilate pre- and post-ablation and those undergoing ablation on dose-adjusted warfarin, with or without low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. Dabigatran was held 24-30 h pre-procedure and restarted 4-6 h after hemostasis was achieved. We evaluated all thromboembolic and bleeding complications at 3 months post-ablation.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients underwent left atrial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Periprocedural anticoagulation utilized dabigatran in 122 patients and warfarin in 135 patients. Three late thromboembolic complications occurred in the dabigatran group (2.5 %), compared with one (0.7 %) in the warfarin group (p = 0.28). The dabigatran group had similar minor bleeding (2.5 vs. 7.4 %, p = 0.07), major bleeding (1.6 vs. 0.7 %, p = 0.51), and composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (6.6 vs. 8.9 %, p = 0.49) when compared to warfarin. There were no acute thromboembolic complications in either group (<24 h post-ablation).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation for AF or left atrial flutter, use of periprocedural dabigatran etexilate provides a safe and effective anticoagulation strategy compared to warfarin. A prospective randomized study is warranted.

摘要

目的

心房颤动(AF)患者进行左心房导管消融术时,围手术期需要抗凝以尽量减少血栓栓塞并发症。已有报道称,使用达比加群酯进行围手术期抗凝时大出血并发症发生率较高,这引发了人们对其在左心房导管消融术中安全性的担忧。我们试图在一个高容量房颤消融中心评估达比加群使用策略与华法林相比的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对2011年1月至2012年8月在范德比尔特医疗中心接受左心房消融术且至少随访3个月的连续患者进行了回顾性分析。患者队列分为两组,一组在消融前后使用达比加群酯,另一组在剂量调整的华法林基础上进行消融,有或没有低分子量肝素桥接。达比加群在术前24 - 30小时停用,止血后4 - 6小时重新开始使用。我们在消融后3个月评估了所有血栓栓塞和出血并发症。

结果

共有254例患者因心房颤动或左心房扑动接受了左心房导管消融术。围手术期抗凝治疗中,122例患者使用达比加群,135例患者使用华法林。达比加群组发生3例晚期血栓栓塞并发症(2.5%),华法林组发生1例(0.7%)(p = 0.28)。与华法林相比,达比加群组的轻微出血(2.5%对7.4%,p = 0.07)、大出血(1.6%对0.7%,p = 0.51)以及出血和血栓栓塞并发症的综合发生率(6.6%对8.9%,p = 0.49)相似。两组均无急性血栓栓塞并发症(消融后<24小时)。

结论

对于因房颤或左心房扑动接受左心房导管消融术的患者,与华法林相比,围手术期使用达比加群酯提供了一种安全有效的抗凝策略。有必要进行一项前瞻性随机研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验