Authors' reply.
作者信息
Piccinni Giuseppe, Sciusco Andrea, Gurrado Angela, Lissidini Germana, Testini Mario
机构信息
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Section of General Surgery, University Medical School of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
出版信息
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jan;9(1):46-7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Authors' reply.作者回复。
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jan;9(1):46-7.
2
Aberrations of an IR chopping secondary: authors' reply to comment 2 and continuation of authors' reply to comment 1.红外斩波副镜的像差：作者对评论2的回复以及对评论1回复的延续
Appl Opt. 1985 Apr 1;24(7):944. doi: 10.1364/AO.24.000944.
3
Authors' reply: Comment on authors' reply: Patients' perception of risk: informed choice in prenatal testing for foetal aneuploidy.作者回复：对作者回复的评论：患者对风险的认知：胎儿非整倍体产前检测中的知情选择。
Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):238. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013084.
4
Authors' Reply.作者回复。
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Mar;20(2):266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.12.001.
5
Authors' Reply.作者回复。
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;20(1):125-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.002.
6
Authors' Reply: In reply.作者回复：作为回复。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):e191. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002926.
7
Reply to Senefeld and Hunter: Physiology in Medicine: Neuromuscular consequences of diabetic neuropathy. The authors' reply.对塞内费尔德和亨特的回复：医学中的生理学：糖尿病性神经病变的神经肌肉后果。作者的回复。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jul 1;121(1):361. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00423.2016.
8
Reply to: Comments on the authors' reply to the critical appraisal concerning "Wearable cardioverter defibrillators for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest: a health technology assessment and patient focus group study".回复：对作者对关于“用于预防心脏性猝死的可穿戴式心脏复律除颤器：一项卫生技术评估和患者焦点小组研究”的批判性评价的回复的评论
Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Mar 22;12:129-131. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S202581. eCollection 2019.
9
Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Reply to "Cognitive performance in women with fibromyalgia' by de Heredia-Torres and colleagues".作者对致编辑信的回复：对德埃雷迪亚 - 托雷斯及其同事所著《纤维肌痛女性的认知表现》的回复
Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Aug;64(4):E101. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12385.
10
Authors' Reply.作者回复。
Am J Pathol. 2016 Aug;186(8):2234-2235. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Does laparoscopic appendectomy impart an advantage over open appendectomy in elderly patients?对于老年患者，腹腔镜阑尾切除术比开腹阑尾切除术有优势吗？
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1534-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1545-9.
2
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗儿童阑尾炎的疗效比较：来自全国住院患者样本（NIS）的数据，2006-2008 年。
World J Surg. 2012 Mar;36(3):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1417-8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的成本效益：倾向评分匹配的多层次方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Oct;13(5):549-60. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0355-6. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion.腹腔镜阑尾切除术 20 年后的中转率：分析导致中转开腹的术者和患者相关因素。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomies: experience of a surgical unit.腹腔镜阑尾切除术：一个外科科室的经验
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2009;18(4):242-7. doi: 10.1080/13645700903053840.
Zotero 插件