Dept of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
J Sport Rehabil. 2013 Aug;22(3):224-8. doi: 10.1123/jsr.22.3.224. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the standard of care for individuals with ACL rupture. Balance deficits have been observed in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using advanced posturography, which is the current gold standard. It is unclear if postural-control deficits exist when assessed by the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), which is a clinical assessment of balance.
The purpose of this study is to determine if postural-control deficits are present in individuals with ACLR as measured by the BESS.
Thirty participants were included in this study. Fifteen had a history of unilateral ACLR and were compared with 15 matched controls.
The BESS consists of 3 stances (double-limb, single-limb, and tandem) on 2 surfaces (firm and foam). Participants begin in each stance with hands on their hips and eyes closed while trying to stand as still as possible for 20 s.
Each participant performed 3 trials of each stance (18 total), and errors were assessed during each trial and summed to create a total score.
We observed a significant group x stance interaction (P = .004) and a significant main effect for stance (P < .001). Post hoc analysis revealed that the ACLR group had worse balance on the single-leg foam stance than did controls. Finally, the reconstructed group had more errors when total BESS score was examined (P = .02).
Balance deficits exist in individuals with ACLR as measured by the BESS. Total BESS score was different between groups. The only condition that differed between groups was the single-leg stance on the unstable foam surface.
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是 ACL 破裂患者的标准治疗方法。使用先进的姿势描记术已经观察到 ACL 重建(ACLR)患者存在平衡缺陷,这是目前的金标准。尚不清楚当使用平衡错误评分系统(BESS)进行评估时是否存在姿势控制缺陷,BESS 是对平衡的临床评估。
本研究旨在确定 BESS 测量的 ACLR 患者是否存在姿势控制缺陷。
本研究纳入了 30 名参与者。其中 15 名有单侧 ACLR 病史,与 15 名匹配的对照组进行比较。
BESS 由 3 种姿势(双足、单足和串联)和 2 种表面(坚固和泡沫)组成。参与者以手放在臀部,眼睛闭上开始每个姿势,尝试尽可能静止地站立 20 秒。
每位参与者完成每个姿势的 3 次试验(共 18 次),在每次试验中评估错误并相加以得出总分。
我们观察到组 x 姿势交互作用有统计学意义(P =.004),姿势有显著的主效应(P <.001)。事后分析显示,ACL 重建组在单腿泡沫姿势下的平衡较差。最后,当总 BESS 评分被检查时,重建组的错误更多(P =.02)。
BESS 测量的 ACLR 患者存在平衡缺陷。组间总 BESS 评分不同。仅在单腿不稳定泡沫表面的姿势上,组间存在差异。