a Department of Psychiatry-CHUV , Institute of Psychotherapy, Cèdres-Cery , Prilly-Lausanne , Switzerland.
Psychother Res. 2013;23(6):633-45. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.791404. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by both maladaptive thinking and problematic schemas. Kramer and colleagues (2011) showed that using the motive-oriented therapeutic relationship (MOTR), based on the individualized understanding of the patient according to Plan Analysis (Caspar, 2007), can improve treatment outcomes for BPD. The present process-outcome pilot study aimed to examine the effects of the motive-oriented therapeutic relationship on the cognitive biases of patients with BPD. Change in biased cognitions in N=10 patients who were subject to MOTR was compared to that of N=10 patients who received psychiatric-psychodynamic treatment (Gunderson & Links, 2008). Results show a greater decrease in over-generalizations in patients who received MOTR, compared to the patients who received the psychiatric-psychodynamic treatment. These changes were related to outcome in various ways. These findings underline the importance of an individualized case formulation method in bringing about therapeutic change.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的特征是适应性思维和有问题的图式。克莱默等人(2011)表明,使用基于对患者的个体化理解的动机导向治疗关系(MOTR),根据计划分析(Caspar,2007),可以改善 BPD 的治疗效果。本过程-结果先导研究旨在检查动机导向治疗关系对 BPD 患者认知偏差的影响。N=10 名接受 MOTR 的患者的偏倚认知变化与 N=10 名接受精神科-心理动力学治疗的患者(Gunderson & Links,2008)进行了比较。结果表明,接受 MOTR 的患者的过度概括减少幅度更大,而接受精神科-心理动力学治疗的患者则减少幅度较小。这些变化与结果以多种方式相关。这些发现强调了个体化案例制定方法在带来治疗变化方面的重要性。