• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对精神障碍诊断的反应:可靠自报告测量工具的开发和验证。

Patients responses to diagnoses of mental disorders: Development and validation of a reliable self-report measure.

机构信息

Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;30(1):e1854. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1854. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1854
PMID:32918397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7992288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Psychiatric patients are regularly informed about diagnoses. Treatment guidelines assume that informing patients fosters functional coping processes, but few research exists on how patients respond. Thus, the objective was to develop a standardized self-report measure to assess patients reactions to diagnoses.

METHODS

Fifty nine items were generated based on a qualitative study. The process of item selection and determination of the factor structure were performed on a sample of 252 patients: Results of an explorative factor analysis with a randomly split sub-sample 1 were cross-validated by confirmatory factor analysis on sub-sample 2. The revised 26-item instrument was revaluated using data from an independent sample of 1.271 patients with different diagnoses.

RESULTS

Three functional and three dysfunctional processing styles emerged from the analyses and provided good model fit in the revaluation study (TLI = 0.935; CFI = 0.943; RMSEA = 0.051; SRMR = 0.048). Variance-analytical calculations and post hoc analyses revealed significant differences among diagnoses with regard to coping styles, such as schizophrenia was associated with self-stigmatization and anorexia nervosa showed pronounced over-identification. Overall, various diagnosis-dependent specifics were found.

CONCLUSIONS

As patients reactions to diagnoses vary substantially, their formation, impact on treatment and overall cause should be investigated in further studies.

摘要

目的

精神科患者经常被告知诊断结果。治疗指南假设告知患者可以促进功能应对过程,但关于患者的反应的研究很少。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种标准化的自我报告量表来评估患者对诊断的反应。

方法

根据一项定性研究,共生成了 59 个项目。项目选择和因子结构确定的过程是在 252 名患者的样本上进行的:对随机分为两半的子样本 1 进行探索性因子分析的结果,通过对子样本 2 的验证性因子分析进行交叉验证。对经过修订的 26 项工具进行了重新评估,使用来自具有不同诊断的 1271 名独立患者的数据集。

结果

从分析中得出了三种功能和三种功能失调的处理方式,并且在重新评估研究中提供了良好的模型拟合(TLI = 0.935;CFI = 0.943;RMSEA = 0.051;SRMR = 0.048)。方差分析计算和事后分析表明,不同诊断的应对方式存在显著差异,例如精神分裂症与自我污名化有关,而厌食症则表现出明显的过度认同。总体而言,发现了与诊断相关的各种特定问题。

结论

由于患者对诊断的反应存在很大差异,应在进一步的研究中调查其形成、对治疗的影响和总体原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1828/7992288/336611a69366/MPR-30-e1854-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1828/7992288/336611a69366/MPR-30-e1854-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1828/7992288/336611a69366/MPR-30-e1854-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients responses to diagnoses of mental disorders: Development and validation of a reliable self-report measure.患者对精神障碍诊断的反应:可靠自报告测量工具的开发和验证。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;30(1):e1854. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1854. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
[French translation, validation and adaptation of the Stigma Scale].[耻辱量表的法语翻译、验证与改编]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
3
The positive mental health instrument: development and validation of a culturally relevant scale in a multi-ethnic Asian population.积极心理健康量表:在多族群亚洲人群中开发和验证具有文化相关性的量表。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Oct 31;9:92. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-92.
4
Development and initial validation of a reliable German self-report measure to assess acute cannabis intoxication-effects (CanTox-17).开发并初步验证了一种可靠的德国自评量表,用于评估急性大麻中毒效应(CanTox-17)。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022 Sep;31(3):e1925. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1925. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
5
Development and validation of the Rapid Positive Mental Health Instrument (R-PMHI) for measuring mental health outcomes in the population.快速积极心理健康量表(R-PMHI)的开发与验证:用于测量人群心理健康结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08569-w.
6
The Development of Two New Computer Adaptive Tests To Evaluate Feelings of Loss in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feelings of Loss-Self and Feelings of Loss-Person With Traumatic Brain Injury.开发两个新的计算机自适应测试来评估创伤性脑损伤患者照顾者的失落感:TBI-CareQOL 失落感-自我和创伤性脑损伤患者的失落感-人。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4S):S31-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
Calibration and initial validation of a general self-efficacy item bank and short form for the NIH PROMIS.NIH PROMIS 一般自我效能感项目库和简式量表的校准和初步验证。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2513-2523. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02198-6. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
A Brief Measure for the Assessment of Competence in Coping With Death: The Coping With Death Scale Short Version.应对死亡能力评估的简要测量工具:应对死亡量表简短版。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Assessing psychological adjustment and cultural reintegration after military service: development and psychometric evaluation of the post-separation Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM).评估兵役后的心理调整和文化再融入:分离后军民调整和再融入度量表(M-CARM)的编制和心理计量学评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02936-y.
10
Mental status evaluation in older adults with cancer: Development of the Mental Health Index-13.老年人癌症患者精神状态评估:心理健康指数-13 的制定。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):241-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
[Revised S3 guidelines on schizophrenia : Developmental process and selected recommendations].[精神分裂症修订版S3指南:制定过程及部分建议]
Nervenarzt. 2020 Jan;91(1):26-33. doi: 10.1007/s00115-019-00813-y.
2
Factors influencing the level of self-stigmatisation in people with mental illness.影响精神病患者自我污名化程度的因素。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;64(4):374-380. doi: 10.1177/0020764018766561. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Shared Decision-Making: a Systematic Review Focusing on Mood Disorders.共享决策:一项关注心境障碍的系统评价。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0892-0.
4
The impact of self-stigmatization on medication attitude in schizophrenia patients.自我污名化对精神分裂症患者药物态度的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
5
Stigma of psychiatric diseases and psychiatry.精神疾病及精神病学的污名化。
Psychiatr Danub. 2017 Dec;29(Suppl 5):877-879.
6
Posttraumatic growth among people with serious mental illness, psychosis and posttraumatic stress symptoms.创伤后成长在患有严重精神疾病、精神病和创伤后应激症状的人群中。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;81:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
7
Induced vomiting for attention seeking and secondary gain: An unusual cause of pseudo-resistant hypertension.为寻求关注和继发获益而诱导呕吐:假性难治性高血压的一种罕见病因。
JRSM Open. 2017 Aug 1;8(8):2054270417717667. doi: 10.1177/2054270417717667. eCollection 2017 Aug.
8
Communication skills training for mental health professionals working with people with severe mental illness.针对为重度精神疾病患者提供服务的心理健康专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6(6):CD010006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010006.pub2.
9
The importance of strengthening competence and control beliefs in patients with psychosis to reduce treatment hindering self-stigmatization.加强精神病患者的能力和控制信念,以减少治疗障碍性自我污名化的重要性。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.053. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
10
The lived experience of anorexia nervosa in adolescence, comparison of the points of view of adolescents, parents, and professionals: A metasynthesis.青少年神经性厌食症的生活体验:青少年、父母和专业人士观点的比较——一项整合分析
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;65:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 21.