Suppr超能文献

养老院居民抑郁的运动干预: 一项随机对照试验及成本效益分析 (OPERA)。

Exercise for depression in care home residents: a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis (OPERA).

机构信息

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(18):1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17180.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many older people living in care homes (long term residential care or nursing homes) are depressed. Exercise is a promising non-drug intervention for preventing and treating depression in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a 'whole-home' intervention, consisting of training for residential and nursing home staff backed up with a twice-weekly, physiotherapist-led exercise class on depressive symptoms in care home residents.

DESIGN

A cluster randomised controlled trial with a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare (1) the prevalence of depression in intervention homes with that in control homes in all residents contributing data 12 months after homes were randomised (cross-sectional analysis); (2) the number of depressive symptoms at 6 months between intervention and control homes in residents who were depressed at pre-randomisation baseline assessment (depressed cohort comparison); and (3) the number of depressive symptoms at 12 months between intervention and control homes in all residents who were present at pre-randomisation baseline assessment (cohort comparison).

SETTING

Seventy-eight care homes in Coventry and Warwickshire and north-east London.

PARTICIPANTS

Care home residents aged ≥ 65 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Control intervention: Depression awareness training programme for care home staff. Active intervention: A 'whole-home' exercise intervention, consisting of training for care home staff backed up with a twice-weekly, physiotherapist-led exercise group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Geriatric Depression Scale-15, proxy European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), cost-effectiveness from an National Health Service perspective, peripheral fractures and death.

RESULTS

We recruited a total of 1054 participants. Cross-sectional analysis: We obtained 595 Geriatric Depression Scale-15 scores and 724 proxy EQ-5D scores. For the cohort analyses we obtained 765 baseline Geriatric Depression Scale-15 scores and 776 proxy EQ-5D scores. Of the 781 who we assessed prior to randomisation, 765 provided a Geriatric Depression Scale-15 score. Of these 374 (49%) were depressed and constitute our depressed cohort. Resource-use and quality-adjusted life-year data, based on proxy EQ-5D, were available for 798 residents recruited prior to randomisation. We delivered 3191 group exercise sessions with 31,705 person attendances and an average group size of 10 (5.3 study participants and 4.6 non-study participants). On average, our participants attended around half of the possible sessions. No serious adverse events occurred during the group exercise sessions. In the cross-sectional analysis the odds for being depressed were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 1.09] lower in the intervention group at 12 months. The point estimates for benefit for both the cohort analysis (0.13, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.60) and depressed cohort (0.22, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.95) favoured the control intervention. There was no evidence of differences in fracture rates or mortality (odds ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.48) between the two groups. There was no evidence of differences in the other outcomes between the two groups. Economic analysis: The additional National Health Service cost of the OPERA intervention was £374 per participant (95% CI -£655 to £1404); the mean difference in quality-adjusted life-year was -0.0014 (95% CI -0.0728 to 0.0699). The active intervention was thus dominated by the control intervention, which was more effective and less costly.

CONCLUSION

The results do not support the use of a whole-home physical activity and moderate-intensity exercise programme to reduce depression in care home residents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43769277.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 18. See the Health Technology Assessment programme website for further project information.

摘要

背景

许多居住在养老院(长期居住护理或疗养院)的老年人都患有抑郁症。运动是一种有前途的非药物干预措施,可用于预防和治疗这一人群的抑郁症。

目的

评估一项“全屋”干预措施的效果,该措施包括对住宅和疗养院工作人员进行培训,并由物理治疗师每周两次带领锻炼班,以改善养老院居民的抑郁症状。

设计

一项集群随机对照试验,结合成本效益分析,比较(1)干预组和对照组所有参与数据的居民在随机分组后 12 个月的抑郁发生率(横断面分析);(2)在基线评估时有抑郁症状的居民在 6 个月时的抑郁症状数量,在干预组和对照组之间进行比较(抑郁队列比较);(3)在基线评估时有抑郁症状的居民在 12 个月时的抑郁症状数量,在所有参与研究的居民中进行比较(队列比较)。

地点

考文垂和沃里克郡以及伦敦东北部的 78 家养老院。

参与者

年龄≥65 岁的养老院居民。

干预措施

对照组干预:对疗养院工作人员进行抑郁症意识培训计划。实验组干预:一项“全屋”运动干预措施,包括对疗养院工作人员进行培训,并由物理治疗师每周两次带领锻炼小组。

主要结局测量指标

老年抑郁量表-15(Geriatric Depression Scale-15),代理欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D),从英国国家医疗服务体系的角度评估成本效益,外周骨折和死亡。

结果

我们共招募了 1054 名参与者。横断面分析:我们获得了 595 份老年抑郁量表-15 评分和 724 份代理 EQ-5D 评分。对于队列分析,我们获得了 765 份基线老年抑郁量表-15 评分和 776 份代理 EQ-5D 评分。在随机分组前,我们评估了 781 名参与者,其中 765 名提供了老年抑郁量表-15 评分。其中 374 名(49%)患有抑郁症,构成了我们的抑郁症队列。基于代理 EQ-5D,我们获得了 798 名在随机分组前招募的居民的资源利用和质量调整生命年数据。我们共开展了 3191 次小组锻炼课程,共有 31705 人次参加,平均小组规模为 10 人(5.3 名研究参与者和 4.6 名非研究参与者)。我们的参与者平均参加了大约一半的可能课程。在小组锻炼课程中没有发生严重的不良事件。在横断面分析中,干预组在 12 个月时抑郁的可能性低 0.76(95%置信区间 0.53 至 1.09)。队列分析(0.13,95%置信区间-0.33 至 0.60)和抑郁症队列(0.22,95%置信区间-0.52 至 0.95)的点估计均倾向于对照组干预。两组之间的骨折率或死亡率没有差异(比值比 1.07,95%置信区间 0.79 至 1.48)。两组之间的其他结局也没有差异。经济分析:OPERA 干预的额外国家医疗服务成本为每位参与者 374 英镑(95%置信区间-655 英镑至 1404 英镑);质量调整生命年的平均差异为-0.0014(95%置信区间-0.0728 至 0.0699)。因此,积极干预被对照组干预所主导,对照组干预更有效且成本更低。

结论

结果不支持使用全屋身体活动和中等强度运动方案来降低养老院居民的抑郁症。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN43769277。

资金

该项目由英国国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划资助,将在《卫生技术评估》杂志全文发表;第 17 卷,第 18 期。欲了解该项目的更多信息,请访问卫生技术评估计划网站。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验