Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Box 357475, Seattle, Wash. 98195, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 May;144(5):507-16. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0153.
The authors examined the correlates of root caries experience for middle-aged adults (aged 45-64 years) and older adults (65 years and older) to test the hypothesis that the factors related to root caries are different for middle-aged adults than they are for older adults.
The authors conducted an observational cross-sectional study that focused on adult patients aged 45 to 97 years recruited from the Northwest Practice-based REsearch Collaborative in Evidence-based DENTistry research network (N = 775). The outcome variable was any root caries experience (no/yes). The authors hypothesized that sociodemographic, intra- oral and behavioral factors were root caries correlates. The authors used Poisson regression models to generate overall and age-stratified prevalence ratios (PRs) of root caries, and they used generalized estimating equations to account for practice-level clustering of participants.
A total of 19.6 percent of adults had any root caries. A dentist's assessment that the patient was at high risk of developing any caries was associated with greater prevalence of root caries experience in both middle-aged adults (PR, 2.70; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.63-4.46) and older adults (PR, 1.87; 95 percent CI, 1.19-2.95). The following factors were associated significantly with increased root caries prevalence but only for middle-aged adults: male sex (P = .02), self-reported dry mouth (P < .001), exposed roots (P = .03) and increased frequency of eating or drinking between meals (P = .03). No other covariates were related to root caries experience for older adults.
Within a practice-based research network, the factors associated with root caries experience were different for middle-aged adults than they were for older adults. Research is needed to identify relevant root caries correlates for adults 65 years and older. Practical Implications. Interventions aimed at preventing root caries are likely to be different for middle-aged adults than for older adults. Dentists should use root caries prevention programs that address appropriate aged-based risk factors.
作者研究了中年(45-64 岁)和老年(65 岁及以上)成年人根龋经历的相关因素,以检验以下假设,即与根龋相关的因素在中年人群和老年人群中是不同的。
作者开展了一项观察性横断面研究,该研究集中于从西北实践基础研究合作组织在循证牙科研究网络(N=775)招募的年龄在 45 岁至 97 岁的成年患者。因变量为任何根龋经历(无/有)。作者假设社会人口学、口腔内和行为因素是根龋的相关因素。作者使用泊松回归模型生成根龋的总体和年龄分层患病率比(PR),并使用广义估计方程来解释参与者的实践水平聚类。
共有 19.6%的成年人有任何根龋。牙医评估患者有发生任何龋齿的高风险,这与中年成年人(PR,2.70;95%置信区间[CI],1.63-4.46)和老年成年人(PR,1.87;95%CI,1.19-2.95)根龋经历的更高患病率相关。以下因素与根龋患病率的增加显著相关,但仅与中年成年人相关:男性(P=0.02)、自我报告的口干(P<0.001)、暴露的根(P=0.03)和增加进食或饮水的频率(P=0.03)。没有其他协变量与老年成年人的根龋经历相关。
在实践基础研究网络中,与根龋经历相关的因素在中年成年人和老年成年人中是不同的。需要研究确定 65 岁及以上成年人中与根龋相关的因素。实际意义。针对预防根龋的干预措施可能在中年成年人和老年成年人之间有所不同。牙医应该使用针对适当年龄的风险因素的根龋预防计划。