Suppr超能文献

住院肺炎链球菌下呼吸道感染后阳性胸片结果和血培养对不良结局的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Impact of positive chest X-ray findings and blood cultures on adverse outcomes following hospitalized pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection: a population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 2;13:197. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-197.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the clinical presentation and outcome of pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) without positive chest X-ray findings and blood cultures. We investigated the prognostic impact of a pulmonary infiltrate and bacteraemia on the clinical course of hospitalized patients with confirmed pneumococcal LRTI.

METHODS

We studied a population-based multi-centre cohort of 705 adults hospitalized with LRTI and Streptococcus pneumoniae in LRT specimens or blood: 193 without pulmonary infiltrate or bacteraemia, 250 with X-ray confirmed pneumonia, and 262 with bacteraemia. We compared adverse outcomes in the three groups and used multiple regression analyses to adjust for differences in age, sex, comorbidity, and lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Patients with no infiltrate and no bacteraemia were of similar age but had more comorbidity than the other groups (Charlson index score ≥1: no infiltrate and no bacteraemia 81% vs. infiltrate without bacteraemia 72% vs. bacteraemia 61%), smoked more tobacco, and had more respiratory symptoms. In contrast, patients with a pulmonary infiltrate or bacteraemia had more inflammation (median C-reactive protein: no infiltrate and no bacteraemia 82 mg/L vs. infiltrate without bacteraemia 163 mg/L vs. bacteraemia 316 mg/L) and higher acute disease severity scores. All adverse outcomes increased from patients with no infiltrate and no bacteraemia to those with an infiltrate and to those with bacteraemia: Length of hospital stay (5 vs. 6 vs. 8 days); intensive care admission (7% vs. 20% vs. 23%); pulmonary complications (1% vs. 5% vs. 14%); and 30-day mortality (5% vs. 11% vs. 21%). Compared with patients with no infiltrate and no bacteraemia, the adjusted 30-day mortality rate ratio was 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-4.1) in patients with an infiltrate without bacteraemia and 4.1 (95% CI 2.0-8.5) in bacteraemia patients. Adjustment for acute disease severity and inflammatory markers weakened these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization with confirmed pneumococcal LRTI is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality even without positive chest X-ray findings and blood cultures. Still, there is a clinically important outcome gradient from LRTI patients with pneumococcal isolation only to those with detected pulmonary infiltrate or bacteraemia which is partly mediated by higher acute disease severity and inflammation.

摘要

背景

对于 X 光胸片和血培养均无阳性结果的肺炎链球菌下呼吸道感染(LRTI)患者,其临床表现和预后知之甚少。我们研究了肺部浸润和菌血症对确诊肺炎链球菌 LRTI 住院患者临床病程的预后影响。

方法

我们研究了一项基于人群的多中心队列研究,纳入了 705 名因 LRTI 住院的成年人,在 LRT 标本或血液中分离出肺炎链球菌:193 例无肺部浸润或菌血症,250 例 X 光胸片确诊为肺炎,262 例菌血症。我们比较了三组患者的不良结局,并使用多变量回归分析来调整年龄、性别、合并症和生活方式因素的差异。

结果

无肺部浸润和无菌血症的患者年龄相似,但合并症多于其他两组(Charlson 指数评分≥1:无肺部浸润和无菌血症组 81% vs. 肺部浸润但无菌血症组 72% vs. 菌血症组 61%),吸烟更多,呼吸道症状更多。相比之下,有肺部浸润或菌血症的患者炎症更严重(中位 C 反应蛋白:无肺部浸润和无菌血症组 82mg/L vs. 肺部浸润但无菌血症组 163mg/L vs. 菌血症组 316mg/L),急性疾病严重程度评分更高。所有不良结局均从无肺部浸润和无菌血症患者逐渐增加至肺部浸润患者和菌血症患者:住院时间(5 天 vs. 6 天 vs. 8 天);重症监护病房入住率(7% vs. 20% vs. 23%);肺部并发症(1% vs. 5% vs. 14%);30 天死亡率(5% vs. 11% vs. 21%)。与无肺部浸润和无菌血症患者相比,肺部浸润但无菌血症患者 30 天死亡率的调整后比值比为 1.9(95%置信区间(CI)为 0.9-4.1),菌血症患者为 4.1(95%CI 为 2.0-8.5)。调整急性疾病严重程度和炎症标志物后,这些关联有所减弱。

结论

即使 X 光胸片和血培养均无阳性结果,确诊肺炎链球菌 LRTI 也与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。然而,从仅分离出肺炎链球菌的 LRTI 患者到出现肺部浸润或菌血症的患者,临床结局存在显著梯度,这部分与急性疾病严重程度和炎症程度较高有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daea/3655859/7f2ce2130df1/1471-2334-13-197-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验