• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合并颅脑损伤的达比加群出血风险:我们准备好了吗?

Dabigatran bleed risk with closed head injuries: are we prepared?

机构信息

Delray Medical Center/Provisional Level I Trauma Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;119(3):760-5. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS12503. Epub 2013 May 1.

DOI:10.3171/2013.3.JNS12503
PMID:23634730
Abstract

OBJECT

The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has recently been approved in the US as an alternative to warfarin. The lack of guidelines, protocols, and an established specific antidote to reverse the anticoagulation effect of dabigatran potentially increases the rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with closed head injury (CHI). Confronted with this new problem, the authors reviewed their initial clinical experience.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed all cases of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who sustained CHI secondary to ground-level falls and who presented to the authors' provisional regional Level I trauma center between February 2011 and May 2011. The authors divided these patients into 3 groups based on anticoagulant therapy: dabigatran, warfarin, and no anticoagulants.

RESULTS

Between February 2011 and May 2011, CHIs from ground-level falls were sustained by 5 patients while on dabigatran, by 15 patients on warfarin, and by 25 patients who were not on anticoagulants. The treatment of the patients on dabigatran at the authors' institution had great diversity. Repeat CT scans obtained during reversal showed 4 of 5 patients with new or expanded hemorrhages in the dabigatran group, whereas the warfarin group had 3 of 15 (p = 0.03). The overall mortality rate for patients sustaining CHI on dabigatran was 2 (40%) of 5, whereas that of the warfarin group was 0 (0%) of 15 (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It is critical for physicians involved in the care of patients with CHI on dabigatran to be aware of an elevated mortality rate if no treatment protocol or guideline is in place. The authors will soon implement a reversal management protocol for patients with CHI on dabigatran at their institution in an attempt to improve efficacy and safety in their treatment approach.

摘要

目的

直接凝血酶抑制剂达比加群最近已在美国获得批准,可作为华法林的替代品。由于缺乏指南、方案以及逆转达比加群抗凝作用的既定特效解毒剂,可能会增加闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)患者的发病率和死亡率。面对这一新问题,作者回顾了他们的初步临床经验。

方法

作者回顾性分析了 2011 年 2 月至 2011 年 5 月期间因地面坠落导致 CHI 并在作者所在的临时区域一级创伤中心就诊的所有成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)的病例。作者根据抗凝治疗将这些患者分为 3 组:达比加群、华法林和未使用抗凝剂。

结果

2011 年 2 月至 2011 年 5 月期间,因地面坠落导致 CHI 的患者中,有 5 例正在使用达比加群,15 例正在使用华法林,25 例未使用抗凝剂。作者所在机构对使用达比加群的患者的治疗方法差异很大。在逆转过程中获得的重复 CT 扫描显示,达比加群组的 4/5 例患者出现新的或扩大的出血,而华法林组的 15/15 例患者有 3 例(p=0.03)。在使用达比加群的 CHI 患者中,总的死亡率为 5 例中的 2 例(40%),而华法林组为 15 例中的 0 例(0%)(p=0.05)。

结论

如果没有治疗方案或指南,参与达比加群治疗的 CHI 患者的医生必须意识到死亡率会升高。作者将很快在他们所在的机构为使用达比加群的 CHI 患者实施逆转管理方案,以试图提高其治疗方法的疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
Dabigatran bleed risk with closed head injuries: are we prepared?合并颅脑损伤的达比加群出血风险:我们准备好了吗?
J Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;119(3):760-5. doi: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS12503. Epub 2013 May 1.
2
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis.达比加群酯与华法林在伴有基线肾功能异常的房颤患者中的疗效和安全性比较:RE-LY(随机评估长期抗凝治疗)试验分析。
Circulation. 2014 Mar 4;129(9):961-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003628. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients taking dabigatran: report of 3 cases and review of the literature.服用达比加群的患者发生创伤性颅内出血:3 例报告并文献复习。
Neurosurgery. 2013 Aug;73(2):E368-73; discussion E373-4. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000430763.95349.5f.
4
Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin.与华法林相比,达比加群治疗新诊断的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的持续性更高。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):567-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000192. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.老年 Medicare 患者在非瓣膜性心房颤动中接受达比加群或华法林治疗的心血管、出血和死亡率风险。
Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):157-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012061. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
Management and outcomes of major bleeding during treatment with dabigatran or warfarin.达比加群或华法林治疗期间大出血的管理和结局。
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002332. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial.与华法林相比,达比加群的围手术期出血和血栓栓塞事件:来自随机评估长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)随机试验的结果。
Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):343-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090464. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
8
Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial.与华法林相比,达比加群酯在老年和年轻房颤患者中使用 2 剂的出血风险:随机长期抗凝治疗评估(RE-LY)试验分析。
Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯与华法林预防房颤卒中的成本效果比较。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):1-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00289. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
10
Imaging of contrast medium extravasation in anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage with dual-energy computed tomography.双能 CT 成像在抗凝相关脑出血中对比剂外渗的应用。
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2883-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001224. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients with DOAC Therapy-Are the "New" Oral Anticoagulants Really Safer?接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的创伤性脑损伤患者的管理——“新型”口服抗凝剂真的更安全吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):6268. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216268.
2
Patients with Prior Craniectomy or Craniotomy Have No Increased Risk of Acute Hemorrhage after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.先前行过头颅骨切除术或颅骨切开术的患者在轻度创伤性脑损伤后并无急性出血风险增加的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052684.
3
Treatment and outcomes of anticoagulated geriatric trauma patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after falls.
抗凝老年创伤患者跌倒后创伤性颅内出血的治疗和转归。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4297-4304. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01938-7. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Management of Mild Brain Trauma in the Elderly: Literature Review.老年人轻度脑外伤的管理:文献综述
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Dec 21;15(4):809-820. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_205_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
5
Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Head Trauma and Antithrombotic Therapy.头部创伤和抗血栓治疗患者的迟发性颅内出血
J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 25;8(11):1780. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111780.
6
Management of Patients with Acute Subdural Hemorrhage During Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂治疗期间急性硬脑膜下血肿患者的处理。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Apr;30(2):322-333. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0635-4.
7
Intracranial hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients with mild traumatic brain injury: significant differences between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists.抗凝治疗的轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的颅内出血:直接口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂之间存在显著差异。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;13(7):1077-1087. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1806-1. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Prevalence of Intracranial Hemorrhage after Blunt Head Trauma in Patients on Pre-injury Dabigatran.钝性头部创伤后,受伤前服用达比加群的患者颅内出血的患病率
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):794-799. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.33092. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血和凝血功能障碍管理指南:第四版》
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 12;20:100. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1265-x.
10
Dabigatran-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: Literature Review and Institutional Experience.达比加群相关颅内出血:文献综述与机构经验
Neurohospitalist. 2015 Oct;5(4):234-44. doi: 10.1177/1941874415569069.