• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全身麻醉模拟期间的意外事件。

Unplanned incidents during comprehensive anesthesia simulation.

作者信息

DeAnda A, Gaba D M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1990 Jul;71(1):77-82. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199007000-00014.

DOI:10.1213/00000539-199007000-00014
PMID:2363534
Abstract

In analyzing recordings of first- and second-year residents performing anesthesia in a comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment (CASE 1.2), we noted the occurrence of unplanned incidents. Utilizing a modified critical incident technique, we documented 132 unplanned incidents during 19 simulations (range 3-14, mean 6-947). Ninety-six (73%) of the incidents were considered simple incidents, and 36 (27%) were considered critical incidents. The incidents were classified as either human errors (65.9%), equipment failures (3%), fixation errors (20.5%), or unknown causes (10.6%). Human errors accounted for 87 of the incidents (range 1-12, mean 4.579), fixation errors accounted for 27 of the incidents (range 0-3, mean 1.421), and equipment failures accounted for only four of the incidents (range 0-2, mean 0.211). There was a significant (P less than 0.025) difference overall between resident groups, although no one class differed significantly from the others. The data confirm that most incidents are due to human error rather than equipment failure, and document fixation errors as a frequent cause of incidents in anesthesia. The data indicate that although most incidents are simple and do not progress into more serious incidents, human error remains ubiquitous, and that formal training and education should include recognition of events and the responses to them, in addition to prevention.

摘要

在分析一年级和二年级住院医师在综合麻醉模拟环境中(案例1.2)实施麻醉的记录时,我们注意到了意外事件的发生。利用改进的关键事件技术,我们在19次模拟中记录了132起意外事件(范围为3 - 14起,平均6 - 947起)。其中96起(73%)事件被认为是简单事件,36起(27%)被认为是关键事件。这些事件被分类为人为失误(65.9%)、设备故障(3%)、固定失误(20.5%)或原因不明(10.6%)。人为失误占87起事件(范围为1 - 12起,平均4.579起),固定失误占27起事件(范围为0 - 3起,平均1.421起),设备故障仅占4起事件(范围为0 - 2起,平均0.211起)。尽管各住院医师组之间没有哪一类存在显著差异,但总体上存在显著差异(P小于0.025)。数据证实大多数事件是由于人为失误而非设备故障,并记录了固定失误是麻醉中事件的常见原因。数据表明,尽管大多数事件是简单的,不会发展为更严重的事件,但人为失误仍然普遍存在,除了预防之外,正规培训和教育还应包括对事件的识别及其应对措施。

相似文献

1
Unplanned incidents during comprehensive anesthesia simulation.全身麻醉模拟期间的意外事件。
Anesth Analg. 1990 Jul;71(1):77-82. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199007000-00014.
2
Role of experience in the response to simulated critical incidents.经验在应对模拟危急事件中的作用。
Anesth Analg. 1991 Mar;72(3):308-15. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199103000-00006.
3
An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection.麻醉管理中的主要失误及设备故障分析:预防与检测的考量因素
Anesthesiology. 1984 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198401000-00008.
4
Management of anesthesia equipment failure: a simulation-based resident skill assessment.麻醉设备故障管理:基于模拟的住院医师技能评估
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):426-33. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa3079.
5
Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors.可预防的麻醉事故:人为因素研究
Anesthesiology. 1978 Dec;49(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197812000-00004.
6
Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multiinstitutional study.使用基于人体模型的模拟对麻醉住院医师进行评估:一项多机构研究。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Dec;97(6):1434-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200212000-00015.
7
The Thai Anesthesia Incident Monitoring Study (Thai AIMS) of anesthetic equipment failure/malfunction: an analysis of 1996 incident reports.泰国麻醉事件监测研究(泰国AIMS)之麻醉设备故障/失灵情况:对1996份事件报告的分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Nov;92(11):1442-9.
8
Critical incident reports concerning anaesthetic equipment: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from 2006-2008*.关于麻醉设备的重大事故报告:对英国国家报告和学习系统(NRLS)2006-2008 年数据的分析*。
Anaesthesia. 2011 Oct;66(10):879-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06826.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Medication errors in anesthesia: an 8-year retrospective analysis at an urban university hospital.
J Anesth. 2008;22(3):248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00540-008-0624-4. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
10
Anesthesiologists' management of simulated critical incidents.麻醉医生对模拟危急事件的管理。
Anesthesiology. 1992 Apr;76(4):495-501. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199204000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative crisis resource management simulation training in anaesthesia.麻醉术中危机资源管理模拟培训
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;68(1):36-44. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1151_23. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
A Century of Technology in Anesthesia & Analgesia.一个世纪的麻醉学与镇痛技术发展历程。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2S Suppl 1):S48-S61. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006027. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults.
全印度困难气道协会2016年成人意外困难气管插管管理指南。
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;60(12):885-898. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.195481.
4
A simulation-based program to train medical residents to lead and perform advanced cardiovascular life support.一个基于模拟的项目,用于培训住院医师领导和实施高级心血管生命支持。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Oct;39(4):63-9. doi: 10.3810/hp.2011.10.923.
5
Anesthesia equipment and human error.麻醉设备与人为失误。
J Clin Monit Comput. 1999 Jul;15(5):319-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1009919207870.
6
Human factors research in anesthesia patient safety.麻醉患者安全中的人为因素研究。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:756-60.
7
Clinical risk management in anaesthesia.麻醉中的临床风险管理
Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;4(2):115-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.2.115.
8
The Virtual Anesthesiology Training Simulation System.虚拟麻醉培训模拟系统
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Apr;42(4):267-73. doi: 10.1007/BF03010700.