• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化摄取值(SAM)在 ¹⁸F-FDG PET 评估结直肠癌肝转移治疗反应中的应用。

Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) IN ¹⁸F-FDG PET assessment of treatment response in colorectal liver metastases.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium,

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Aug;40(8):1214-22. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2421-z. Epub 2013 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00259-013-2421-z
PMID:23636802
Abstract

PURPOSE

Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) is a PET parameter for assessing the total metabolic load of malignant processes, avoiding partial volume effects and lesion segmentation. The potential role of this parameter in the assessment of response to chemotherapy and bevacizumab was tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with potentially resectable liver metastases (mCRC).

METHODS

(18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 18 mCRC patients with liver metastases before treatment and after five cycles of FOLFOX/FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. Of the 18 patients, 16 subsequently underwent resection of liver metastases. Baseline and follow-up SUVmax, and SAM as well as reduction in SUVmax (∆SUVmax) and SAM (∆SAM) of all liver metastases were correlated with morphological response, and progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS).

RESULTS

A significant reduction in metabolic activity of the liver metastases was seen after chemotherapy with a median ∆SUVmax of 25.3% and ∆SAM of 94.5% (p = 0.033 and 0.003). Median baseline SUVmax and SAM values were significantly different between morphological responders and nonresponders (3.8 vs. 7.2, p = 0.021; and 34 vs. 211, p = 0.002, respectively), but neither baseline PET parameters nor morphological response was correlated with PFS or OS. Follow-up SUVmax and SAM as well as ∆SAM were found to be prognostic factors. The median PFS and OS in the patient group with a high follow-up SUVmax were 10.4 months and 32 months, compared to a median PFS of 14.7 months and a median OS which had not been reached in the group with a low follow-up SUVmax (p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively). The patient group with a high follow-up SAM and a low ∆SAM had a median PFS and OS of 9.4 months and 32 months, whereas the other group had a median PFS of 14.7 months and a median OS which had not been reached (p = 0.002 for both PFS and OS).

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET imaging is a useful tool to assess treatment response and predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC who undergo chemotherapy before liver metastasectomy. Follow-up SUVmax, follow-up SAM and ∆SAM were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS.

摘要

目的

标准化摄取值(SAM)是一种 PET 参数,用于评估恶性肿瘤的总代谢负荷,避免了部分容积效应和病变分割的影响。在有潜在可切除肝转移的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中,测试了该参数在评估化疗和贝伐珠单抗反应中的作用。

方法

对 18 例 mCRC 肝转移患者进行(18)F-FDG PET/CT 检查,在治疗前和 FOLFOX/FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗治疗 5 个周期后进行检查。这 18 例患者中有 16 例随后进行了肝转移切除术。对所有肝转移灶的基线和随访 SUVmax、SAM 以及 SUVmax(∆SUVmax)和 SAM(∆SAM)的减少与形态学反应、无进展生存(PFS)和总生存(OS)进行了相关性分析。

结果

化疗后,肝转移灶的代谢活性明显降低,中位∆SUVmax 为 25.3%,∆SAM 为 94.5%(p=0.033 和 0.003)。形态学反应者和无反应者的基线 SUVmax 和 SAM 值中位数差异有统计学意义(3.8 比 7.2,p=0.021;34 比 211,p=0.002),但基线 PET 参数和形态学反应均与 PFS 或 OS 无相关性。随访 SUVmax 和 SAM 以及∆SAM 被发现是预后因素。高随访 SUVmax 组患者的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 10.4 个月和 32 个月,而低随访 SUVmax 组患者的中位 PFS 为 14.7 个月,中位 OS 尚未达到(p=0.01 和 0.003)。高随访 SAM 和低∆SAM 的患者的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 9.4 个月和 32 个月,而其他患者的中位 PFS 为 14.7 个月,中位 OS 尚未达到(PFS 和 OS 均为 0.002)。

结论

(18)F-FDG PET 成像可用于评估 mCRC 患者在肝转移切除术前接受化疗后的治疗反应,并预测临床结局。随访 SUVmax、随访 SAM 和∆SAM 是 PFS 和 OS 的显著预后因素。

相似文献

1
Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) IN ¹⁸F-FDG PET assessment of treatment response in colorectal liver metastases.标准化摄取值(SAM)在 ¹⁸F-FDG PET 评估结直肠癌肝转移治疗反应中的应用。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Aug;40(8):1214-22. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2421-z. Epub 2013 May 1.
2
Value of DCE-MRI and FDG-PET/CT in the prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases.DCE-MRI 和 FDG-PET/CT 对贝伐珠单抗术前化疗预测结直肠癌肝转移疗效的价值。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jun 5;106(12):1926-33. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.184. Epub 2012 May 17.
3
Metabolic Parameters as Predictors for Progression Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.代谢参数作为转移性结直肠癌患者无进展生存期和总生存期的预测指标。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):2683-2691. doi: 10.1007/s12253-020-00865-5. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
4
Early PET/CT scan is more effective than RECIST in predicting outcome of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.早期 PET/CT 扫描比 RECIST 更能预测接受贝伐珠单抗联合术前化疗治疗的结直肠癌肝转移患者的预后。
J Nucl Med. 2013 Dec;54(12):2062-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.119909. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
5
Prospective evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients receiving hepatic arterial and systemic chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描对接受肝动脉化疗和全身化疗的不可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者的前瞻性评估
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Jul;17(7):644-50. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12421. Epub 2015 May 23.
6
Metabolic response to preoperative chemotherapy predicts prognosis for patients undergoing surgical resection of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.对术前化疗的代谢反应可预测接受手术切除肝转移结直肠癌患者的预后。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2420-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3590-0. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
7
PET/CT in the evaluation of response to treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with bevacizumab and irinotecan.正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在评估贝伐单抗和伊立替康治疗结直肠癌肝转移疗效中的应用
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Feb;5(1):37-43. doi: 10.1177/153303460600500105.
8
A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases.一项比较术前化疗联合贝伐珠单抗与术后化疗联合贝伐珠单抗用于可直接切除的肝转移性结直肠癌患者的随机 II 期研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020 Sep;19(3):e140-e150. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initially treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: results from ARIES, a bevacizumab observational cohort study.贝伐珠单抗联合 FOLFOX 或 FOLFIRI 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:来自贝伐珠单抗观察性队列研究 ARIES 的结果。
Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1486-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0190. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
10
FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in non-optimally resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.FOLFOX6 和贝伐珠单抗治疗结直肠癌不可切除肝转移
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 29;104(7):1079-84. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.43. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep radiomics-based fusion model for prediction of bevacizumab treatment response and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multicentre cohort study.基于深度影像组学的融合模型预测结直肠癌肝转移患者贝伐单抗治疗反应及预后:一项多中心队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Oct 12;65:102271. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102271. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis on F-FDG.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在结直肠癌肝转移评估中的应用:一项全面综述,重点关注 F-FDG。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2023 Dec;40(6):465-491. doi: 10.1007/s10585-023-10231-9. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comment on Mertens et al.: Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM): a partial volume independent marker of total lesion glycolysis in liver metastases.对默滕斯等人的评论:标准化附加代谢活性(SAM):肝转移中总病变糖酵解的一个与部分容积无关的标志物。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 May;40(5):788-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2364-4. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
2
The age of reason for FDG PET image-derived indices.基于氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像(FDG PET)图像得出的指标的理性年龄。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Nov;39(11):1670-2. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2239-0. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
3
RECIST: no longer the sharpest tool in the oncology clinical trials toolbox---point.
Role of advanced imaging techniques in the evaluation of oncological therapies in patients with colorectal liver metastases.
先进影像学技术在评估结直肠癌肝转移患者肿瘤治疗中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 21;29(3):521-535. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i3.521.
4
The Value of F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review.F-FDG-PET-CT成像在结直肠癌肝转移治疗评估中的价值:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;12(3):715. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030715.
5
Metabolic Parameters as Predictors for Progression Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.代谢参数作为转移性结直肠癌患者无进展生存期和总生存期的预测指标。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):2683-2691. doi: 10.1007/s12253-020-00865-5. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Clinical laboratory and imaging evidence for effectiveness of agarose-agarose macrobeads containing stem-like cells derived from a mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell population (RMBs) in treatment-resistant, advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Evaluation of a biological-systems approach to cancer therapy (U.S. FDA IND-BB 10091; NCT 02046174, NCT 01053013).含源自小鼠肾腺癌细胞群(RMBs)的干细胞样细胞的琼脂糖-琼脂糖大珠在治疗抵抗性晚期转移性结直肠癌中有效性的临床实验室及影像学证据:癌症治疗生物学系统方法的评估(美国食品药品监督管理局研究性新药申请-生物制品许可申请10091;临床试验注册号NCT 02046174,NCT 01053013)
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;30(1):72-83. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.08.
7
Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for tumor response assessment-a review of clinical practices and radiomics studies.用于肿瘤反应评估的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描——临床实践与影像组学研究综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2016 Aug;5(4):364-370. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2016.07.12.
8
Quantitative Evaluation of Therapeutic Response by FDG-PET-CT in Metastatic Breast Cancer.基于 FDG-PET-CT 的转移性乳腺癌治疗反应的定量评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2016 May 9;3:19. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2016.00019. eCollection 2016.
9
Feasibility of novel PPP1R15A and proposed ANXA11 single nucleotide polymorphisms as predictive markers for bevacizumab regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.新型PPP1R15A及拟议的ANXA11单核苷酸多态性作为转移性结直肠癌贝伐单抗治疗方案预测标志物的可行性
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(8):1705-14. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2177-5. Epub 2016 May 13.
10
Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis.(18)FDG PET/CT在结直肠癌肝转移患者中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析
Cancer Imaging. 2015 Nov 20;15:19. doi: 10.1186/s40644-015-0055-z.
RECIST:不再是肿瘤临床试验工具包中最锋利的工具——要点。
Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 15;72(20):5145-9; discussion 5150. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0058. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
Reproducibility of functional volume and activity concentration in 18F-FDG PET/CT of liver metastases in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌肝转移 18F-FDG PET/CT 中功能体积和活性浓度的可重复性。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Dec;39(12):1858-67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2233-6. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
5
Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM): a partial volume independent marker of total lesion glycolysis in liver metastases.标准化摄取比值(SAM):肝转移灶总体病灶糖酵解的一种与部分容积无关的标志物。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Sep;39(9):1441-8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2166-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
Serial FDG-PET/CT for early outcome prediction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.化疗的转移性结直肠癌患者中,氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描的系列检查用于早期预后预测。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1687-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr554. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
7
A systematic review of treatment guidelines for metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌治疗指南的系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):e31-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02765.x.
8
Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.西妥昔单抗联合伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗:根据肿瘤 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变状态更新的总生存分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2011-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
9
PET functional volume delineation: a robustness and repeatability study.正电子发射断层扫描(PET)功能体积勾画:稳健性和可重复性研究。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Apr;38(4):663-72. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1688-6. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
Monitoring response to antiangiogenic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer using imaging markers derived from PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.使用来自 PET 和动态对比增强 MRI 的成像标志物监测非小细胞肺癌对血管生成抑制剂治疗的反应。
J Nucl Med. 2011 Jan;52(1):48-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078261. Epub 2010 Dec 13.