Suppr超能文献

内标记抗表皮生长因子受体亲合体PEP09239

In-Labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor Affibody PEP09239

作者信息

Chopra Arvind

机构信息

National Center for Biotechnology Information, NLM, Bethesda, MD 20894

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2, ErbB2) modulates its activity through a tyrosine kinase (TK) signaling pathway and is involved in the development of a variety of cancers (1, 2). Overexpression or amplification of the HER2 gene is known to occur in many cancer types (e.g., 20% of breast cancer) and predicts a poor prognosis for the patient. Invasive methods, such as biopsies, in conjunction with immunohistochemistry and an fluorescence hybridization kit (PathVysion) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration are used to assess the HER2 status of the primary and metastasized neoplastic tumors; however, because of sampling bias and tumor heterogeneity, results obtained with these procedures are not reliable (2). In the clinic, F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ([F]-FDG) is commonly used with positron emission tomography (PET) to detect and determine the tumor burden of a patient, but this imaging agent does not distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, cannot differentiate tumors that overexpress HER2 from those that have a low or no expression of the receptor, and often identifies inflammation as a false-positive neoplasm (1). An Affibody molecule is a chain of 58 amino acids (6.5 kDa) that contains a modified B domain of the staphylococcal protein A and can be obtained chemical synthesis or produced in bacteria with the use of recombinant DNA technology (3). The Affibody scaffold consists of 3-helix peptide chains: helix chains 1 and 2 are composed of 13 randomized amino acids and contain the receptor-binding moieties of the Affibody (4), and the third helix chain functions as a stabilizer of the Affibody molecule (5). Affibody molecules have high affinity and specificity of binding to the targeted molecule and are considered to be extremely suitable for the noninvasive imaging of solid tumors (6). The radionuclide-labeled Affibody Z (and its derivatives), directed against the HER2 (Z = 22 pM for HER2), has been used successfully with molecular imaging techniques to screen for breast cancer patients who are likely to benefit most from treatment with trastuzumab (a monoclonal antibody that targets HER2) or lapatinib (a small-molecule drug that inhibits the TK activity of the HER2 signaling pathway) (6, 7). To further improve the imaging properties of radiolabeled Affibodies, it was hypothesized that reducing the size of the molecule is likely to facilitate rapid clearance of the tracer from circulation, high penetration into solid tumors, ameliorate the uptake of label in nontargeted organs (such as the liver), and generate increased tumor/background ratios compared with the 3-helix molecule (8). To test the hypothesis, the stabilizing helix chain was removed from the 3-helix Z molecule, and the 2-helix Affibody (MUT-DS; ~4.6 kDa) was determined to have a binding affinity of 5 nM for HER2 (8). In another study, MUT-DS was conjugated with DOTA, a metal chelator, labeled with Ga ([Ga]-DOTA-MUT-DS), and evaluated for the detection of human ovarian carcinoma SKOV3 cell xenograft tumors (these cells overexpress HER2) in nude mice (9). Although [Ga]-DOTA-MUT-DS was rapidly cleared from circulation and had a high binding specificity for the tumors, it was observed that the uptake of radioactivity in the lesions was considerably lower (4.12 ± 0.83% injected dose per gram tissue (ID/g) at 2 h postinjection (p.i.)) (9) than the accumulation of label observed in the SKOV3 cell tumors with a similarly labeled HER2-binding 3-helix Affibody ([Ga]-ABY-002; 12.4 ± 3.8% at 2 h p.i.) (10). This indicated that there was no particular advantage in using a smaller Affibody compared with the larger parent 3-helix molecule. In addition, the comparison between the two Affibody types may be inaccurate for two reasons. First, the data that were compared were obtained from two separate studies in which the two SKOV3 cell subclones used to generate the tumors in the mice may not have produced lesions of the same size. Second, the same amounts of HER2 may not have been expressed in the neoplasms (4). Therefore, to ascertain the similarities or dissimilarities between MUT-DS and ABY-002 Affibodies, it was necessary to investigate the biological characteristics of the two entities simultaneously with the use of identical handling techniques and to perform similar and studies simultaneously with the two Affibodies (4). Rosik et al. compared the receptor targeting and biodistribution characteristics of In-labeled MUT-DS ( [In]PEP09239) and In-labeled ABY-002 ([In]ABY-002) in a side-by-side study of mice bearing xenograft tumors generated with SKOV3 cells (these cells express ~1.2 × 10 HER2 receptor/cell) and human colorectal LS174T cells (these cells express low levels of HER2; ~3.9 × 10 receptors/cell), respectively (4).

摘要

人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2,ErbB2)通过酪氨酸激酶(TK)信号通路调节其活性,并参与多种癌症的发生发展(1,2)。已知HER2基因的过表达或扩增在许多癌症类型中都有发生(例如,约20%的乳腺癌),并预示着患者预后不良。侵入性方法,如活检,结合免疫组织化学和美国食品药品监督管理局批准的荧光杂交试剂盒(PathVysion),用于评估原发性和转移性肿瘤的HER2状态;然而,由于采样偏差和肿瘤异质性,这些方法获得的结果并不可靠(2)。在临床上,F标记的氟脱氧葡萄糖([F]-FDG)通常与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)一起用于检测和确定患者的肿瘤负荷,但这种成像剂无法区分良性和恶性病变,不能区分过表达HER2的肿瘤与低表达或无该受体表达的肿瘤,并且常常将炎症识别为假阳性肿瘤(1)。亲和体分子是由58个氨基酸组成的链(约6.5 kDa),包含葡萄球菌蛋白A的修饰B结构域,可通过化学合成获得,或利用重组DNA技术在细菌中生产(3)。亲和体支架由3条螺旋肽链组成:螺旋链1和2由13个随机氨基酸组成,包含亲和体的受体结合部分(4),第三条螺旋链作为亲和体分子的稳定剂(5)。亲和体分子对靶向分子具有高亲和力和特异性,被认为非常适合实体瘤的无创成像(6)。针对HER2的放射性核素标记亲和体Z(及其衍生物)(与HER2的结合亲和力Z = 22 pM)已成功用于分子成像技术,以筛选可能从曲妥珠单抗(一种靶向HER2的单克隆抗体)或拉帕替尼(一种抑制HER2信号通路TK活性的小分子药物)治疗中获益最大的乳腺癌患者(6,7)。为了进一步改善放射性标记亲和体的成像特性,有人提出假设,减小分子尺寸可能有助于示踪剂从循环中快速清除,提高对实体瘤的穿透性,改善在非靶向器官(如肝脏)中的标记摄取,并与3螺旋分子相比提高肿瘤/背景比值(8)。为了验证这一假设,从3螺旋Z分子中去除了稳定螺旋链,确定2螺旋亲和体(MUT-DS;约4.6 kDa)与HER2的结合亲和力为5 nM(8)。在另一项研究中,将MUT-DS与金属螯合剂DOTA偶联,用Ga标记([Ga]-DOTA-MUT-DS),并评估其在裸鼠中检测人卵巢癌SKOV3细胞异种移植瘤(这些细胞过表达HER2)的能力(9)。尽管[Ga]-DOTA-MUT-DS从循环中快速清除,对肿瘤具有高结合特异性,但观察到病变部位的放射性摄取明显较低(注射后2小时(p.i.)为4.12±0.83%注射剂量每克组织(ID/g))(9),低于用类似标记的HER2结合3螺旋亲和体([Ga]-ABY-002;注射后2小时为12.4±3.8%)在SKOV3细胞肿瘤中观察到的标记积累(10)。这表明与较大的亲本3螺旋分子相比,使用较小的亲和体没有特别优势。此外,两种亲和体类型之间的比较可能不准确,原因有两个。首先,所比较的数据来自两项独立研究,其中用于在小鼠中生成肿瘤的两个SKOV3细胞亚克隆可能没有产生大小相同的病变。其次,肿瘤中HER2的表达量可能不同(4)。因此,为了确定MUT-DS和ABY-002亲和体之间的异同,有必要使用相同的处理技术同时研究这两种实体的生物学特性,并同时用这两种亲和体进行类似的研究(4)。罗西克等人在一项并列研究中,比较了In标记的MUT-DS([In]PEP09239)和In标记的ABY-002([In]ABY-002)在分别携带由SKOV3细胞(这些细胞表达约1.2×10个HER2受体/细胞)和人结肠LS174T细胞(这些细胞HER2表达水平低;约3.9×10个受体/细胞)生成的异种移植瘤的小鼠中的受体靶向和生物分布特征(4)。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验