Suppr超能文献

经 CRT-D 治疗患者室性心律失常的临床意义。

Clinical significance of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients treated with CRT-D.

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. Valentina.Kutyifa@heart. roehester.edu

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jul;10(7):943-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data on the outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients developing ventricular arrhythmias are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes by heart rate in patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial.

METHODS

Slow VT was defined as VTs with heart rate < 200 beats/min. Fast VT with a heart rate ≥200 beats/min and VF (>250 beats/min) were considered as a combined category. Primary end point was heart failure (HF) or death. Secondary end point included all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

There were 228 (12.7%) patients with slow VT and 198 (11.1%) with fast VT/VF. In time-dependent analysis, slow VT was associated with an increased risk of HF/death in CRT-D patients with left branch bundle block (LBBB; hazard ratio [HR] 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-5.55; P < .001), but not in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.52-2.19; P = .867; interaction P value = .017). CRT-D patients with LBBB and fast VT/VF doubled their risk of HF/death compared to ICD patients (interaction P value = .06). Slow VT events were also predictive of death in CRT-D patients with LBBB (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.66-7.28; P < .001), but not in ICD patients (interaction P value = .06). Slow VTs were highly predictive of subsequent fast VT/VF (HR 4.33; 95% CI 3.01-6.24; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Slow VT episodes are predictive of subsequent fast VT/VF. Slow VT and fast VT/VF episodes in CRT-D patients are associated with an increased risk of subsequent HF/death. CRT-D-treated LBBB patients with slow VTs have a significantly higher risk of mortality.

摘要

背景

关于患有室性心律失常的心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者的治疗结果数据有限。

目的

评估多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗试验中因心率而发生室性心动过速(VT)或心室颤动(VF)的患者的预后价值。

方法

慢 VT 定义为心率<200 次/分的 VT。心率≥200 次/分的快 VT 和 VF(>250 次/分)被视为联合类别。主要终点是心力衰竭(HF)或死亡。次要终点包括全因死亡率。

结果

228 例(12.7%)患者发生缓慢 VT,198 例(11.1%)患者发生快速 VT/VF。在时间依赖性分析中,左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的 CRT-D 患者发生缓慢 VT 与 HF/死亡风险增加相关(风险比[HR]3.19;95%置信区间[CI]1.83-5.55;P<.001),但在植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者中则不然(HR 1.03;95%CI 0.52-2.19;P=.867;交互 P 值=.017)。LBBB 且快速 VT/VF 的 CRT-D 患者的 HF/死亡风险是 ICD 患者的两倍(交互 P 值=.06)。在 LBBB 的 CRT-D 患者中,缓慢 VT 事件也预测死亡(HR 3.48;95%CI 1.66-7.28;P<.001),但在 ICD 患者中则不然(交互 P 值=.06)。缓慢 VT 高度预测随后发生的快速 VT/VF(HR 4.33;95%CI 3.01-6.24;P<.001)。

结论

缓慢 VT 发作可预测随后的快速 VT/VF。CRT-D 患者的缓慢 VT 和快速 VT/VF 发作与随后 HF/死亡风险增加相关。有缓慢 VT 的 CRT-D 治疗 LBBB 患者的死亡率显著升高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验