• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似神经根病患者的临床与电生理检查结果比较

Comparison of clinical and electrophysiological findings in patients with suspected radiculopathies.

作者信息

Inal Esra E, Eser Filiz, Aktekin Lale A, Oksüz Ergun, Bodur Hatice

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nafiz Körez Sincan State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):169-73. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00364.

DOI:10.3233/BMR-2012-00364
PMID:23640318
Abstract

Cervical and lumbar roots may be irritated or compressed due to the pathological conditions such as disc herniations, degenerative foraminal stenosis, trauma and tumors. Electrophysiologic tests are frequently used in conjunction with imaging modalities for evaluation of low back and neck pain radiating to extremities, primarily for the purpose of establishing the presence or absence of a radiculopathy. In this study, we aimed to evalulate the relationship between clinic and electroneuromyographic (ENMG) findings in patients with suspected radiculopathies. Forty one patients with radicular complaints in the upper extremities and 51 patients with radicular complaints in the lower extremities were included in this study. McNemar test and Kappa coefficients between the two methods were applied to each group of patients, in order to test the significance of the difference between the two diagnostic procedures' ability on finding out the pathology. The McNemar test identified a significant difference between the two diagnostic approaches both for cervical and lumbar radiculopathies (p<0.001). The Kappa coefficients between the two methods were determined as 0.08 and 0.07, respectively. This means, efficacy of anamnesis and neurological examination for the prediction of electrodiagnostic tests was found to be limited. Normal neurological examination results in a patient with suspected radiculopathy can not eliminate abnormal electrodiagnostic test results; likewise, abnormal findings in the neurological examination would not mean finding pathologies in the electrodiagnostic tests. For more accurate approach to a patient, neurological examination and electrodiagnostic tests must be used and interpreted together.

摘要

由于椎间盘突出、椎间孔狭窄、创伤和肿瘤等病理状况,颈神经根和腰神经根可能会受到刺激或压迫。电生理检查经常与成像方式联合使用,用于评估放射至四肢的腰背痛和颈痛,主要目的是确定是否存在神经根病。在本研究中,我们旨在评估疑似神经根病患者的临床症状与神经肌电图(ENMG)检查结果之间的关系。本研究纳入了41例上肢有神经根症状的患者和51例下肢有神经根症状的患者。对每组患者应用两种方法之间的McNemar检验和Kappa系数,以检验两种诊断方法在发现病变方面的差异是否具有显著性。McNemar检验确定,对于颈神经根病和腰神经根病,两种诊断方法之间均存在显著差异(p<0.001)。两种方法之间的Kappa系数分别确定为0.08和0.07。这意味着,发现病史和进行神经学检查对预测电诊断检查结果的有效性有限。疑似神经根病患者的神经学检查结果正常并不能排除电诊断检查结果异常;同样,神经学检查中的异常发现并不意味着电诊断检查中存在病变。为了更准确地诊断患者,必须同时使用和解读神经学检查和电诊断检查。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical and electrophysiological findings in patients with suspected radiculopathies.疑似神经根病患者的临床与电生理检查结果比较
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):169-73. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-00364.
2
The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者中垂肩试验和直腿抬高试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;14(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31816b2f99.
3
Evaluating the patient with suspected radiculopathy.评估疑似神经根病患者。
PM R. 2013 May;5(5 Suppl):S41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
4
Evaluation of persons with suspected lumbosacral and cervical radiculopathy: Electrodiagnostic assessment and implications for treatment and outcomes (Part I).腰骶神经根病和颈神经根病可疑患者的评估:电诊断评估及其对治疗和结果的影响(第一部分)。
Muscle Nerve. 2020 Oct;62(4):462-473. doi: 10.1002/mus.26997. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
The role of somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathies.体感诱发电位在腰骶神经根病诊断中的作用。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May-Jun;49(4):131-42.
6
The relationship between history and physical examination findings and the outcome of electrodiagnostic testing in patients with sciatica referred to physical therapy.坐骨神经痛患者接受物理治疗时,其病史和体格检查结果与电诊断检查结果的关系。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):508-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5002. Epub 2014 May 22.
7
Predicting electrodiagnostic outcome in patients with upper limb symptoms: are the history and physical examination helpful?预测上肢症状患者的电诊断结果:病史和体格检查有帮助吗?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):436-41. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.4426.
8
Electrodiagnostic evidence for cervical radiculopathy and suprascapular neuropathy in shoulder pain.肩部疼痛中颈神经根病和肩胛上神经病变的电诊断证据
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;36(6):333-9.
9
Incremental ability of needle electromyography to detect radiculopathy in patients with radiating low back pain using different diagnostic criteria.使用不同诊断标准时,针肌电图对放射状腰痛患者神经根病的检出能力的增量。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):990-2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
Comparison of surgical and electrodiagnostic findings in single root lumbosacral radiculopathies.单根腰骶神经根病的手术与电诊断结果比较
Muscle Nerve. 2003 Jan;27(1):60-4. doi: 10.1002/mus.10291.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological examination for cervical radiculopathy: a scoping review.用于诊断神经根型颈椎病的神经学检查:一项范围综述
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08560-9.
2
Correlation between Findings in Physical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Nerve Conduction Studies in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症所致腰骶神经根病的体格检查、磁共振成像及神经传导研究结果之间的相关性
Adv Orthop. 2020 Jan 24;2020:9719813. doi: 10.1155/2020/9719813. eCollection 2020.
3
Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1-A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.
评估颈痛及相关疾病成人颈椎解剖结构完整性的临床检查的可靠性和有效性:第1部分——来自颈椎评估与诊断研究评估(CADRE)协作组的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2225-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5153-0. Epub 2017 Jun 12.