• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中后足下垂刺激与踝足矫形器的比较:30 周结局。

Foot drop stimulation versus ankle foot orthosis after stroke: 30-week outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 3051, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6):1660-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000334. Epub 2013 May 2.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000334
PMID:23640829
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Drop foot after stroke may be addressed using an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) or a foot drop stimulator (FDS). The Functional Ambulation: Standard Treatment versus Electric Stimulation Therapy (FASTEST) trial was a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial comparing FDS and AFO for drop foot among people ≥ 3 months after stroke with gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s.

METHODS

Participants (n=197; 79 females and 118 males; 61.14 ± 11.61 years of age; time after stroke 4.55 ± 4.72 years) were randomized to 30 weeks of either FDS or a standard AFO. Eight dose-matched physical therapy sessions were provided to both groups during the first 6 weeks of the trial.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement within both groups from baseline to 30 weeks in comfortable gait speed (95% confidence interval for mean change, 0.11-0.17 m/s for FDS and 0.12-0.18 m/s for AFO) and fast gait speed. However, no significant differences in gait speed were found in the between-group comparisons. Secondary outcomes (standard measures of body structure and function, activity, and participation) improved significantly in both groups, whereas user satisfaction was significantly higher in the FDS group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Using either an FDS or an AFO for 30 weeks yielded clinically and statistically significant improvements in gait speed and other functional outcomes. User satisfaction was higher in the FDS group. Although both groups did receive intervention, this large clinical trial provides evidence that FDS or AFO with initial physical therapy sessions can provide a significant and clinically meaningful benefit even years after stroke. Clinical Trial Registration Information- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT01138995.

摘要

背景与目的

脑卒中后出现足下垂可通过踝足矫形器(AFO)或足下垂刺激器(FDS)来解决。功能步行:标准治疗与电刺激疗法(FASTEST)试验是一项多中心、随机、单盲试验,比较了 FDS 和 AFO 对脑卒中后 3 个月且步态速度≤0.8m/s 的患者的足下垂。

方法

共有 197 名参与者(79 名女性和 118 名男性;61.14±11.61 岁;脑卒中后时间 4.55±4.72 年)被随机分为 FDS 或标准 AFO 组,接受 30 周的治疗。两组在试验的前 6 周内均接受了 8 次剂量匹配的物理治疗。

结果

两组在舒适步态速度(FDS 组和 AFO 组的平均变化的 95%置信区间分别为 0.11-0.17m/s 和 0.12-0.18m/s)和快速步态速度方面均从基线到 30 周时都有显著改善。然而,两组之间的步态速度没有显著差异。次要结局(身体结构和功能、活动和参与的标准测量)在两组中均有显著改善,而 FDS 组的用户满意度显著高于对照组。

结论

使用 FDS 或 AFO 治疗 30 周,在步态速度和其他功能结局方面均有临床和统计学上的显著改善。FDS 组的用户满意度更高。尽管两组都接受了干预,但这项大型临床试验提供了证据,表明即使在脑卒中后数年,FDS 或 AFO 与初始物理治疗相结合也能提供显著且具有临床意义的益处。

临床试验注册信息-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01138995。

相似文献

1
Foot drop stimulation versus ankle foot orthosis after stroke: 30-week outcomes.脑卒中后足下垂刺激与踝足矫形器的比较:30 周结局。
Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6):1660-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000334. Epub 2013 May 2.
2
Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.一种足下垂刺激器和踝足矫形器对脑卒中后步行能力的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):579-91. doi: 10.1177/1545968313481278. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
3
Response and prediction of improvement in gait speed from functional electrical stimulation in persons with poststroke drop foot.中风后足下垂患者功能性电刺激步态速度改善的反应与预测
PM R. 2014 Jul;6(7):587-601; quiz 601. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
4
Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke.一项随机对照试验的长期随访:比较慢性卒中患者腓总神经功能性电刺激与踝足矫形器的效果
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):911-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968315570325. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.慢性卒中患者中腓总神经功能性电刺激与踝足矫形器的效果比较:一项随机对照试验
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):688-97. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521007. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
6
Kinematic and kinetic benefits of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation in people with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.使用踝足矫形器对中风后足下垂患者进行植入式腓总神经刺激的运动学和动力学益处。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(4):547-558. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180822.
7
Effects of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation on gait quality, energy expenditure, participation and user satisfaction in patients with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.植入式腓总神经刺激对使用踝足矫形器的中风后足下垂患者步态质量、能量消耗、参与度及用户满意度的影响
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):795-807. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150501.
8
Gait Characteristics Following Stroke: A Prospective Crossover Study to Compare Ankle-Foot Orthosis with Functional Electrical Stimulation.中风后的步态特征:一项比较踝足矫形器与功能性电刺激的前瞻性交叉研究。
Neurol India. 2022 Sep-Oct;70(5):1830-1835. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.359240.
9
Towards physiological ankle movements with the ActiGait implantable drop foot stimulator in chronic stroke.使用 ActiGait 可植入式足下垂刺激器实现慢性中风患者的生理性踝关节运动。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(5):557-69. doi: 10.3233/RNN-120283.
10
Restoration of ankle movements with the ActiGait implantable drop foot stimulator: a safe and reliable treatment option for permanent central leg palsy.使用ActiGait植入式垂足刺激器恢复踝关节活动:永久性中枢性腿部麻痹的一种安全可靠的治疗选择。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):70-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS142110. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Influences of Gait Training with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Gait Ability and Independence in Severe Hemiplegia and Pusher Behavior with Unilateral Spatial Neglect Following Stroke: A Retrospective Historical Controlled Study.膝踝足矫形器步态训练对重度偏瘫患者步态能力、独立性及脑卒中后单侧空间忽视所致推挤行为的影响:一项回顾性历史对照研究
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70535. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70535.
2
Exploring the relationship of clinical walking tests with 8-months inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based real world mobility tracking in stroke and spinal cord injury survivors.探索中风和脊髓损伤幸存者的临床步行测试与基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的8个月真实世界活动追踪之间的关系。
Neurol Res Pract. 2025 May 9;7(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s42466-025-00386-z.
3
Effects of functional electrical stimulation on cognition rate and gait in neurological patients during single- and dual-task walking.功能性电刺激对神经疾病患者单任务和双任务行走时认知率及步态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98755-w.
4
Therapeutic and orthotic effects of an adaptive functional electrical stimulation system on gait biomechanics in participants with stroke.适应性功能性电刺激系统对中风患者步态生物力学的治疗和矫正作用
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Mar 18;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01577-0.
5
Functional electrical stimulation for walking in adults with cerebral palsy: a service evaluation.功能性电刺激用于成人脑瘫患者行走:一项服务评估。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Feb 28;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01538-z.
6
The efficacy of lower limb orthoses on quality of life, well-being, and participation following stroke: A systematic review.下肢矫形器对中风后生活质量、幸福感和参与度的疗效:一项系统评价。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Dec 11;49(4):388-399. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000389.
7
Implications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on gait ability, balance and kinematic parameters after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中后步态能力、平衡和运动学参数的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Sep 18;21(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01462-2.
8
Soft ankle exoskeleton to counteract dropfoot and excessive inversion.用于抵消足下垂和过度内翻的软性脚踝外骨骼。
Front Neurorobot. 2024 Aug 21;18:1372763. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2024.1372763. eCollection 2024.
9
A single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of a novel brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation (BCI-FES) intervention for gait rehabilitation in the chronic stroke population.一项单中心、评估者盲法、随机对照临床试验,旨在测试新型脑机接口控制功能性电刺激(BCI-FES)干预在慢性脑卒中人群中步态康复的安全性和有效性。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03710-3.
10
Closed-Loop Wearable Device Network of Intrinsically-Controlled, Bilateral Coordinated Functional Electrical Stimulation for Stroke.闭环可穿戴设备网络的内在控制,双边协调的功能性电刺激治疗中风。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 May;11(17):e2304763. doi: 10.1002/advs.202304763. Epub 2024 Mar 1.