• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

继续不遵守美国外科医师学会的建议以减少手术室中的感染暴露:为什么?

Continued non-compliance with the American College of Surgeons recommendations to decrease infectious exposure in the operating room: why?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0019, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Jun;14(3):288-92. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.067. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2012.067
PMID:23641753
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Statement on Sharps Safety recommends the use of double gloving (DG), hands-free zone (HFZ), and blunt-tip suture needles (BTSN) in the operating room to decrease needlestick injuries. Despite this endorsement, compliance is low. This survey determined the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers to compliance with these guidelines.

METHODS

A survey using a voluntary convenience sample of surgical staff members in which queries related to understanding of the ACS recommendations were posed. A total of 107 of the 324 surveys were completed and returned, for a response rate of 33%. Most respondents were residents (64%) or attending surgeons (29%).

RESULTS

Respondents were most familiar with recommendations for DG (58% of residents and 68% of attendings) and HFZ (61% for both groups) but less so for BTSN (48% of residents and 52% of attendings). More than 50% of the staff believed that DG decreased the risk of needlesticks, yet fewer than half used DG more than 75% of the time. Half believed that HFZ protected from sticks, yet fewer than 10% used it at least 75% of the time. Fewer than 50% believed that BTSN minimizes the risk of injury, with fewer than 10% of respondents using them at least 75% of the time. Reasons for non-compliance included decreased tactile sensation with DG, lack of training with HFZ, and lack of availability of BTSN.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve compliance with the ACS recommendations, institutions must improve awareness of the guidelines and the benefits associated with compliance and remove barriers to their incorporation into standard practice.

摘要

背景

美国外科医师学院(ACS)关于锐器安全的声明建议在手术室使用双层手套(DG)、无接触区域(HFZ)和钝头缝线针(BTSN),以减少针刺伤。尽管有这样的认可,但合规率仍然很低。这项调查旨在确定对这些指南的认知、态度和遵守障碍。

方法

使用外科医务人员的自愿便利样本进行调查,其中提出了与理解 ACS 建议相关的查询。共完成并返回了 324 份调查中的 107 份,回复率为 33%。大多数受访者是住院医师(64%)或主治外科医生(29%)。

结果

受访者对 DG(58%的住院医师和 68%的主治外科医生)和 HFZ(两组均为 61%)的建议最熟悉,但对 BTSN 的了解较少(48%的住院医师和 52%的主治外科医生)。超过 50%的工作人员认为 DG 降低了针刺伤的风险,但不到一半的人超过 75%的时间使用 DG。一半的人认为 HFZ 可以防止刺伤,但不到 10%的人至少 75%的时间使用它。不到 50%的人认为 BTSN 将伤害风险降到最低,不到 10%的受访者至少 75%的时间使用它。不遵守的原因包括 DG 降低了触觉,HFZ 缺乏培训,以及 BTSN 缺乏可用性。

结论

为了提高对 ACS 建议的遵守率,机构必须提高对这些指南的认识,以及与遵守相关的好处,并消除将其纳入标准实践的障碍。

相似文献

1
Continued non-compliance with the American College of Surgeons recommendations to decrease infectious exposure in the operating room: why?继续不遵守美国外科医师学会的建议以减少手术室中的感染暴露:为什么?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013 Jun;14(3):288-92. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.067. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Inter-professional differences in compliance with standard precautions in operating theatres: a multi-site, mixed methods study.多站点混合方法研究:手术室标准预防措施的遵守情况中的跨专业差异。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Aug;49(8):953-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
Assessment of preventive measures for accidental blood exposure in operating theaters: a survey of 20 hospitals in Northern France.法国北部20家医院手术室意外血液暴露预防措施的评估
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Aug;34(6):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.03.004.
4
Compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses in South Korea.韩国手术室护士对标准预防措施的依从性。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):739-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.04.253. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
5
Sharps injury prevention guidance among health care professionals: A comparison between self-reported and observed compliance.
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Sep 1;43(9):977-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.210. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Influences on compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses.手术室护士遵守标准预防措施的影响因素。
Am J Infect Control. 2003 Nov;31(7):415-23. doi: 10.1067/mic.2003.68.
7
Strategies for preventing sharps injuries in the operating room.手术室预防锐器伤的策略。
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;85(6):1299-305, xiii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.09.012.
8
Needlestick injuries during surgical procedures: a multidisciplinary online study.手术过程中的针刺伤:一项多学科在线研究。
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Mar;60(2):139-44. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp175. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
9
Is double gloving an effective barrier to protect surgeons against blood exposure due to needlestick injury?双层手套对于保护外科医生免受针刺伤导致的血液暴露是否是一种有效的屏障?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;30(9):928-9; author reply 929. doi: 10.1086/599309.
10
Preventing needlestick injuries in obstetrics and gynecology: how can we improve the use of blunt tip needles in practice?预防妇产科中的针刺伤:我们如何在实际操作中提高钝头针的使用?
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;110(6):1399-403. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000287617.12113.3e.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Single Gloving Still Acceptable? Investigation and Evaluation of Damages on Sterile Latex Gloves in General Surgery.单手套使用是否仍可接受?普通外科无菌乳胶手套损伤情况的调查与评估。
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 29;10(17):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173887.
2
Study-Related Work and Commuting Accidents among Students at the University of Mainz from 12/2012 to 12/2018: Identification of Potential Risk Groups and Implications for Prevention.2012 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月期间美因茨大学学生的学习相关工作和通勤事故:识别潜在风险群体及预防意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 23;17(10):3676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103676.
3
Practice and attitudes regarding double gloving among staff surgeons and surgical trainees.
外科 staff 医生和外科实习生关于双层手套的操作实践与态度。 (注:这里“staff surgeons”字面意思是“员工外科医生”,在医学语境中可理解为“在职外科医生”等类似意思,具体准确含义需结合上下文确定)
Can J Surg. 2018 Aug;61(4):244-250. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013616.
4
Double-Gloving Impairs the Quality of Surgical Knot Tying: A Randomised Controlled Trial.双层手套会影响手术打结质量:一项随机对照试验。
World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2598-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3577-z.
5
Sharp injuries in Japanese operating theaters of HIV/AIDS referral hospitals 2009-2011.2009 - 2011年日本艾滋病转诊医院手术室的锐器伤情况
Ind Health. 2016 Jun 10;54(3):224-9. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2015-0066. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
6
[Occupational exposure to blood in multiple trauma care].[多发伤救治中的职业性血液暴露]
Anaesthesist. 2015 Jan;64(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2401-0. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
7
[Risk estimation of blood-borne infections by emergency room personnel].[急诊室工作人员血源感染的风险评估]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Jul;119(7):575-80. doi: 10.1007/s00113-014-2657-5.
8
Pushing beyond resistors and constipators: implementation considerations for infection prevention best practices.突破阻力和障碍:感染预防最佳实践的实施注意事项。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):388. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0388-3.