• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络推理的最优稀疏性标准。

Optimal sparsity criteria for network inference.

作者信息

Tjärnberg Andreas, Nordling Torbjörn E M, Studham Matthew, Sonnhammer Erik L L

机构信息

Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Comput Biol. 2013 May;20(5):398-408. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0268.

DOI:10.1089/cmb.2012.0268
PMID:23641867
Abstract

Gene regulatory network inference (that is, determination of the regulatory interactions between a set of genes) provides mechanistic insights of central importance to research in systems biology. Most contemporary network inference methods rely on a sparsity/regularization coefficient, which we call ζ (zeta), to determine the degree of sparsity of the network estimates, that is, the total number of links between the nodes. However, they offer little or no advice on how to select this sparsity coefficient, in particular, for biological data with few samples. We show that an empty network is more accurate than estimates obtained for a poor choice of ζ. In order to avoid such poor choices, we propose a method for optimization of ζ, which maximizes the accuracy of the inferred network for any sparsity-dependent inference method and data set. Our procedure is based on leave-one-out cross-optimization and selection of the ζ value that minimizes the prediction error. We also illustrate the adverse effects of noise, few samples, and uninformative experiments on network inference as well as our method for optimization of ζ. We demonstrate that our ζ optimization method for two widely used inference algorithms--Glmnet and NIR--gives accurate and informative estimates of the network structure, given that the data is informative enough.

摘要

基因调控网络推断(即确定一组基因之间的调控相互作用)为系统生物学研究提供了至关重要的机制性见解。大多数当代网络推断方法依赖于一个稀疏性/正则化系数,我们称之为ζ(泽塔),来确定网络估计的稀疏程度,即节点之间的连接总数。然而,它们对于如何选择这个稀疏系数几乎没有提供建议,特别是对于样本较少的生物学数据。我们表明,一个空网络比因ζ选择不当而获得的估计更准确。为了避免这种不当选择,我们提出了一种优化ζ的方法,该方法能使任何依赖稀疏性的推断方法和数据集的推断网络准确性最大化。我们的程序基于留一法交叉优化,并选择使预测误差最小的ζ值。我们还阐述了噪声、样本少和无信息实验对网络推断的不利影响以及我们的ζ优化方法。我们证明,对于两种广泛使用的推断算法——Glmnet和NIR——我们的ζ优化方法在数据足够有信息的情况下,能给出准确且有信息的网络结构估计。

相似文献

1
Optimal sparsity criteria for network inference.网络推理的最优稀疏性标准。
J Comput Biol. 2013 May;20(5):398-408. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0268.
2
Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.使用带贝叶斯正则化的稀疏逻辑回归进行癌症分类中的基因选择。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 1;22(19):2348-55. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl386. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
3
Netter: re-ranking gene network inference predictions using structural network properties.内特尔:利用结构网络属性重新排列基因网络推理预测结果。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Feb 9;17:76. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0913-0.
4
Optimal Sparsity Selection Based on an Information Criterion for Accurate Gene Regulatory Network Inference.基于信息准则的最优稀疏性选择用于准确的基因调控网络推断
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 13;13:855770. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.855770. eCollection 2022.
5
Inferring biomolecular interaction networks based on convex optimization.基于凸优化推断生物分子相互作用网络。
Comput Biol Chem. 2007 Oct;31(5-6):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
6
Avoiding pitfalls in L1-regularised inference of gene networks.避免基因网络L1正则化推断中的陷阱。
Mol Biosyst. 2015 Jan;11(1):287-96. doi: 10.1039/c4mb00419a. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
7
Biological Network Inference and analysis using SEBINI and CABIN.使用SEBINI和CABIN进行生物网络推断与分析。
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;541:551-76. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-243-4_24.
8
Uncovering cancer gene regulation by accurate regulatory network inference from uninformative data.从无信息数据中准确推断调控网络以揭示癌症基因调控。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2020 Nov 9;6(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41540-020-00154-6.
9
Exploring the operational characteristics of inference algorithms for transcriptional networks by means of synthetic data.利用合成数据探索转录网络推理算法的运行特性。
Artif Life. 2008 Winter;14(1):49-63. doi: 10.1162/artl.2008.14.1.49.
10
Selective integration of multiple biological data for supervised network inference.用于监督网络推理的多生物数据的选择性整合。
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 15;21(10):2488-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti339. Epub 2005 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Topology-based metrics for finding the optimal sparsity in gene regulatory network inference.基于拓扑结构的指标在基因调控网络推断中寻找最优稀疏性
Bioinformatics. 2025 May 6;41(5). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf120.
2
Structure-primed embedding on the transcription factor manifold enables transparent model architectures for gene regulatory network and latent activity inference.转录因子流形上的结构引导嵌入能够实现基因调控网络和潜在活动推断的透明模型架构。
Genome Biol. 2024 Jan 18;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03134-1.
3
Optimal Sparsity Selection Based on an Information Criterion for Accurate Gene Regulatory Network Inference.
基于信息准则的最优稀疏性选择用于准确的基因调控网络推断
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 13;13:855770. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.855770. eCollection 2022.
4
Generation of Realistic Gene Regulatory Networks by Enriching for Feed-Forward Loops.通过富集前馈环生成逼真的基因调控网络。
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 10;13:815692. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.815692. eCollection 2022.
5
Uncovering cancer gene regulation by accurate regulatory network inference from uninformative data.从无信息数据中准确推断调控网络以揭示癌症基因调控。
NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2020 Nov 9;6(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41540-020-00154-6.
6
Perturbation-based gene regulatory network inference to unravel oncogenic mechanisms.基于扰动的基因调控网络推断揭示致癌机制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 25;10(1):14149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70941-y.
7
Functional association networks as priors for gene regulatory network inference.功能关联网络作为基因调控网络推断的先验。
Bioinformatics. 2014 Jun 15;30(12):i130-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu285.