Suppr超能文献

对新生儿进行普遍筛查以检测听力障碍——有必要吗?

Universal screening of newborns to detect hearing impairment--is it necessary?

作者信息

Rai Narendra, Thakur Neha

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Army Hospital R&R, Delhi Cantt 10, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jun;77(6):1036-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the recommendations of the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, neonatal hearing screening programs are still not universally available.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate the presence of hearing loss in all newborn babies delivered in our hospital during study period using the transient evoked otoactoustic emission as the primary screening tool followed by confirmation with brainstem evoked response audiometry before six months of age and to determine risk factors responsible for hearing loss.

DESIGN

A prospective study of nonrandomized cohort.

SETTING

Nursery, Postnatal ward and NICU of Tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

500 neonates (439: not at risk; 61: at risk) from a total of 610 neonates born in between 2009 and 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of hearing impairment in the "at risk" and "no risk" group was compared, using proportion test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of hearing loss in newborns both "at risk" and in "no risk" group, risk factors responsible for hearing loss, importance of universal newborn hearing screening.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of hearing impairment was 8 per 1000 screened. The incidence in "no risk" and "at risk" group was 2.27 per 1000 screened and 49.18 per 1000 screened respectively. Statistically significant difference in the incidence of hearing impairment between the two groups. (P<0.05; Proportion Test) was seen. Common risk factors identified were culture positive postnatal infections, birth asphyxia, low birth weight, and prematurity.

CONCLUSIONS

A high incidence of hearing impairment warrants the implementation of universal newborn hearing screening. Considering the economic limitations of our country we may employ screening of "at risk" groups initially.

摘要

背景

与婴儿听力联合委员会的建议相反,新生儿听力筛查项目仍未普及。

目的

前瞻性评估在研究期间我院分娩的所有新生儿中听力损失的情况,使用瞬态诱发耳声发射作为主要筛查工具,随后在六个月龄前用脑干听觉诱发电位进行确诊,并确定导致听力损失的危险因素。

设计

非随机队列的前瞻性研究。

地点

三级医疗中心的新生儿病房、产后病房和新生儿重症监护室。

参与者

2009年至2010年间出生的610名新生儿中的500名(439名:无风险;61名:有风险)。

测量

使用比例检验比较“有风险”组和“无风险”组的听力障碍发生率。

主要观察指标

“有风险”组和“无风险”组新生儿的听力损失发生率、导致听力损失的危险因素、普遍新生儿听力筛查的重要性。

结果

每1000名接受筛查的新生儿中听力障碍的总体发生率为8例。“无风险”组和“有风险”组的发生率分别为每1000名接受筛查的新生儿中2.27例和49.18例。两组之间听力障碍发生率存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05;比例检验)。确定的常见危险因素为产后感染培养阳性、出生窒息、低出生体重和早产。

结论

听力障碍的高发生率保证了普遍新生儿听力筛查的实施。考虑到我国的经济限制,我们可能最初先对“有风险”群体进行筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验