Department of Primary and Community Care, Center for Family Medicine, Geriatric Care and Public Health, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Lancet. 2013 Jun 29;381(9885):2255-64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60590-5. Epub 2013 May 2.
Depression in nursing-home residents is often under-recognised. We aimed to establish the effectiveness of a structural approach to its management.
Between May 15, 2009, and April 30, 2011, we undertook a multicentre, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in four provinces of the Netherlands. A network of nursing homes was invited to enrol one dementia and one somatic unit per nursing home. In enrolled units, nursing-home staff recruited residents, who were eligible as long as we had received written informed consent. Units were randomly allocated to one of five groups with computer-generated random numbers. A multidisciplinary care programme, Act in Case of Depression (AiD), was implemented at different timepoints in each group: at baseline, no groups were implenting the programme (usual care); the first group implemented it shortly after baseline; and other groups sequentially began implementation after assessments at intervals of roughly 4 months. Residents did not know when the intervention was being implemented or what the programme elements were; research staff were masked to intervention implementation, depression treatment, and results of previous assessments; and data analysts were masked to intervention implementation. The primary endpoint was depression prevalence in units, which was the proportion of residents per unit with a score of more than seven on the proxy-based Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR1477.
16 dementia units (403 residents) and 17 somatic units (390 residents) were enrolled in the course of the study. In somatic units, AiD reduced prevalence of depression (adjusted effect size -7·3%, 95% CI -13·7 to -0·9). The effect was not significant in dementia units (0·6, -5·6 to 6·8) and differed significantly from that in somatic units (p=0·031). Adherence to depression assessment procedures was lower in dementia units (69% [SD 19%]) than in somatic units (82% [15%]; p=0·045). Adherence to treatment pathways did not differ between dementia units (43% [SD 33%]) and somatic units (38% [40%]; p=0·745).
A structural approach to management of depression in nursing homes that includes assessment procedures can reduce depression prevalence in somatic units. Improvements are needed in depression screening in dementia units and in implementation of nursing-home treatment protocols generally.
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.
养老院居民的抑郁症常常未被识别。我们旨在确定一种管理抑郁症的结构性方法的有效性。
在 2009 年 5 月 15 日至 2011 年 4 月 30 日期间,我们在荷兰的四个省进行了一项多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。邀请一个养老院网络为每所养老院的一个痴呆症和一个躯体单元招募居民。在注册单元中,养老院工作人员招募符合条件的居民,只要我们收到书面知情同意书。单元被随机分配到五个组之一,使用计算机生成的随机数。多学科护理计划“行动以治疗抑郁”(Act in Case of Depression,AiD)在每个组的不同时间点实施:在基线时,没有组实施该计划(常规护理);第一组在基线后不久实施;其他组在大约 4 个月的间隔进行评估后依次开始实施。居民不知道干预措施何时实施或干预措施的要素是什么;研究人员对干预措施的实施、抑郁治疗和以前评估的结果进行了掩盖;数据分析人员对干预措施的实施进行了掩盖。主要终点是单位内的抑郁患病率,即单位内每位居民在基于代理的康奈尔痴呆症抑郁量表上得分超过 7 的比例。分析采用意向治疗。该试验已在荷兰国家试验注册处注册,编号为 NTR1477。
在研究过程中,共注册了 16 个痴呆单元(403 名居民)和 17 个躯体单元(390 名居民)。在躯体单元中,AiD 降低了抑郁的患病率(调整后的效应大小为-7.3%,95%CI-13.7 至-0.9)。在痴呆单元中,效果不显著(0.6,-5.6 至 6.8),与躯体单元显著不同(p=0.031)。痴呆单元中抑郁评估程序的依从性(69%[标准差 19%])低于躯体单元(82%[15%];p=0.045)。痴呆单元与躯体单元之间的治疗途径的依从性没有差异(43%[标准差 33%]和 38%[40%];p=0.745)。
管理养老院抑郁症的结构性方法,包括评估程序,可以降低躯体单元的抑郁患病率。需要改进痴呆单元的抑郁筛查以及一般的养老院治疗方案的实施。
荷兰健康研究与发展组织。