• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际网络调查中,开放性前列腺切除术患者和机器人辅助前列腺切除术患者自我报告结果的差异。

Differences in self-reported outcomes of open prostatectomy patients and robotic prostatectomy patients in an international web-based survey.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia; Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: kevin.o'

出版信息

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):775-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2013.03.010
PMID:23643697
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient reported outcomes between robotic assisted surgery and non-robotic assisted surgery.

METHODS

This was an international web-based survey based on a qualitative research and literature review, an internet-based questionnaire was developed with approximately 70 items. The questionnaire included both closed and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 193 men of whom 86 had received either open (OP) or robotic (RALP) surgery. A statistically significant (p=0.027), ranked analysis of covariance was found demonstrating higher recent distress in the robotic (RALP) surgery group. Although not statistically significant, there was a pattern of men having robotic (RALP) surgery reporting fewer urinary and bowel problems, but having a greater rate of sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Men who opt for robotic surgery may have higher expectations for robotic (RALP) surgery, when these expectations are not fully met they may be less likely to accept the consequences of this major cancer surgery. Information regarding surgical choice needs to be tailored to ensure that men diagnosed with prostate cancer are fully informed of not only short term surgical and physical outcomes such as erectile dysfunction and incontinence, but also of potential issues with regards to masculinity, lifestyle and sexual health.

摘要

目的

比较机器人辅助手术和非机器人辅助手术的患者报告结果。

方法

这是一项基于定性研究和文献回顾的国际网络调查,开发了一个包含大约 70 个项目的基于互联网的问卷。该问卷包括封闭式和开放式问题。

结果

共收到 193 名男性的回复,其中 86 名接受了开放(OP)或机器人(RALP)手术。通过统计分析发现,机器人(RALP)手术组的近期困扰明显更高(p=0.027)。虽然没有统计学意义,但有一个模式是,选择机器人(RALP)手术的男性报告的尿和肠道问题较少,但性功能障碍的发生率更高。

结论

选择机器人手术的男性可能对机器人(RALP)手术有更高的期望,如果这些期望没有完全得到满足,他们可能不太愿意接受这种主要癌症手术的后果。有关手术选择的信息需要量身定制,以确保被诊断患有前列腺癌的男性不仅充分了解短期手术和身体结果,如勃起功能障碍和尿失禁,还充分了解与男性气质、生活方式和性健康有关的潜在问题。

相似文献

1
Differences in self-reported outcomes of open prostatectomy patients and robotic prostatectomy patients in an international web-based survey.国际网络调查中,开放性前列腺切除术患者和机器人辅助前列腺切除术患者自我报告结果的差异。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):775-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.开放和微创前列腺癌手术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果:来自澳大拉西亚的经验。
BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107 Suppl 3:11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x.
3
Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.微创根治性前列腺切除术:从单纯腹腔镜手术向机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变。
Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9.
4
Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术细节、肿瘤学及功能结果:400例患者,至少随访12个月
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
5
Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.纯腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较:基于经过验证的生活质量结局的比较效果研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):898-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10551.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
6
Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术对男性健康相关生活质量的短期影响及恢复的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.051. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌的生化无复发生存率。
Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.接受机器人辅助腹腔镜或开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的患者的术前期望。
J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):894-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.135. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
9
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:微创方法是否具有显著优势?
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 10;23(32):8170-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1963.
10
Men's experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study.男性在接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)治疗局限性前列腺癌后恢复尿控的体验:一项定性现象学研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Feb;22(3-4):368-78. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12082.

引用本文的文献

1
Transperineal intraprostatic injection of botulinum neurotoxin A vs transurethral resection of prostate for management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia: A prospective randomised study.经会阴前列腺内注射A型肉毒杆菌神经毒素与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生继发下尿路症状的前瞻性随机研究。
Arab J Urol. 2019 Oct 3;17(4):270-278. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1662214. eCollection 2019.