Vavuranakis Manolis, Sigala Fragiska, Vrachatis Dimitrios A, Papaioannou Theodore G, Filis Konstantinos, Kavantzas Nikolaos, Kalogeras Konstantinos I, Massoura Constantina, Toufektzian Levon, Kariori Maria G, Vlasseros Ioannis, Kallikazaros Ioannis, Stefanadis Christodoulos
1st Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Vasa. 2013 May;42(3):184-95. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000267.
Intraplaque neovascularization and vasa vasorum (VV) proliferation contribute in the progression and rupture of atherosclerotic lesions. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has been reported to attain data regarding intraplaque neovessels and VV. However, whether the detection of microbubbles by CEUS within atherosclerotic plaques truly represents microvessels is a point of concern. We aimed to evaluate stable and unstable carotid artery plaque (CAP) VV pattern by CEUS and its correlation with histology and immunochemistry.
Patients with CAP scheduled for plaque endarterectomy were enrolled. CAP was initially identified by conventional ultrasonography and subsequently CEUS (harmonic ultrasound imaging with simultaneous intravenous contrast agent injection) was performed. The recorded image loops were evaluated by a semi-automated method. Plaque specimens were excised and underwent histological and immunochemical (for CD34, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, CD68 and CD3 antibodies) analysis.
Fourteen patients (67.6 ± 10.2 years, 10 males) with a 86.9 ± 11.5 % degree of carotid artery stenosis were evaluated. Histology showed that half of the plaques were unstable. Enhancement of plaque brightness on CEUS was significant for both stable and unstable plaque subgroups (p = 0.018 for both). Immunochemistry showed that microvessels, as assessed by CD34 antibody, were more dense in unstable vs. stable plaques (36.6 ± 17.4 vs. 13.0 ± 7.2 respectively, p = 0.002). However, correlation between plaque brigthness enhancement on CEUS and microvessel density was significant only for stable (r = 0.800, p = 0.031) plaques.
The identification of brightness enhacement during CEUS in carotid atherosclerotic plaques may not always reflect the presence of VV.
斑块内新生血管形成和滋养血管(VV)增殖促进动脉粥样硬化病变的进展和破裂。据报道,对比增强超声(CEUS)可获取有关斑块内新生血管和VV的数据。然而,CEUS在动脉粥样硬化斑块内检测到的微泡是否真的代表微血管仍是一个关注点。我们旨在通过CEUS评估稳定和不稳定颈动脉斑块(CAP)的VV模式及其与组织学和免疫化学的相关性。
纳入计划进行斑块内膜切除术的CAP患者。首先通过传统超声识别CAP,随后进行CEUS(同时静脉注射造影剂的谐波超声成像)。通过半自动方法评估记录的图像环。切除斑块标本并进行组织学和免疫化学(针对CD34、血管内皮生长因子、CD68和CD3抗体)分析。
评估了14例患者(67.6±10.2岁,10例男性),颈动脉狭窄程度为86.9±11.5%。组织学显示一半的斑块不稳定。CEUS上斑块亮度增强在稳定和不稳定斑块亚组中均显著(两者p = 0.018)。免疫化学显示,通过CD34抗体评估,不稳定斑块中的微血管比稳定斑块更密集(分别为36.6±17.4和13.0±7.2,p = 0.002)。然而,CEUS上斑块亮度增强与微血管密度之间的相关性仅在稳定斑块中显著(r = 0.800,p = 0.031)。
CEUS期间颈动脉粥样硬化斑块亮度增强的识别可能并不总是反映VV的存在。