Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):613-36. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 May 1.
The nonvisual self-touch rubber hand paradigm elicits the compelling illusion that one is touching one's own hand even though the two hands are not in contact. In four experiments, we investigated spatial limits of distance (15 cm, 30 cm, 45 cm, 60 cm) and alignment (0°, 90° anti-clockwise) on the nonvisual self-touch illusion and the well-known visual rubber hand illusion. Common procedures (synchronous and asynchronous stimulation administered for 60s with the prosthetic hand at body midline) and common assessment methods were used. Subjective experience of the illusion was assessed by agreement ratings for statements on a questionnaire and time of illusion onset. The nonvisual self-touch illusion was diminished though never abolished by distance and alignment manipulations, whereas the visual rubber hand illusion was more robust against these manipulations. We assessed proprioceptive drift, and implications of a double dissociation between subjective experience of the illusion and proprioceptive drift are discussed.
非视觉自我触摸橡胶手范式引发了一种强烈的错觉,即人们感觉自己正在触摸自己的手,尽管两只手并未接触。在四项实验中,我们研究了非视觉自我触摸错觉和著名的视觉橡胶手错觉的空间距离限制(15cm、30cm、45cm、60cm)和对齐方式(0°、90°逆时针)。采用了相同的程序(同步和异步刺激,使用假肢手在身体中线进行 60 秒刺激)和相同的评估方法。通过问卷上的陈述的一致评分和错觉开始的时间来评估主观体验。尽管距离和对齐方式的变化削弱了非视觉自我触摸错觉,但并未完全消除,而视觉橡胶手错觉则更能抵抗这些变化。我们评估了本体感受漂移,并且讨论了错觉的主观体验和本体感受漂移之间的双重分离的意义。