Suppr超能文献

非侵入性方法快速床边估计正性肌力:理论与初步临床验证。

Non-invasive method for rapid bedside estimation of inotropy: theory and preliminary clinical validation.

机构信息

School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Oct;111(4):580-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet118. Epub 2013 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are numerous techniques which attempt to quantify inotropy (or myocardial contractility). None has yet found general acceptance in anaesthesia and critical care as a practical method. We report a novel approach to the determination of inotropy as a bedside procedure which could identify low inotropy states in patients with clinical heart failure.

METHODS

We estimated the potential and kinetic energy delivered by the left ventricle using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, Uscom, Sydney, Australia) and data available at the point of care. A formula to calculate effective inotropy [Smith-Madigan inotropy index (SMII)] was tested against historical haemodynamic data for 250 control subjects (ASA I patients from preoperative clinic) and 83 patients with acute left ventricular failure (LVF) of New York Heart Association Grade 4 (LVF group). The ratio of potential to kinetic energy (PKR) was investigated as a measure of arterial impedance.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between the control and LVF groups for cardiac index, mean (range)=3.37 (2.84-5.32) vs 1.84 (1.43-2.26) litre min(-1) m(-2); stroke volume index (SVI), 49.2 (39-55) vs 34.3 (23-37) ml m(-2); systemic vascular resistance, 893 (644-1242) vs 1960 (1744-4048) dyn s cm(-5); SMII, 1.78 (1.35-2.24) vs 0.73 (0.43-0.97) W m(-2); and PKR, 29:1 (24-35:1) vs 124:1 (96-174:1), P<0.001 in each case. Normal ranges were calculated for SMII and PKR as mean (+/-1.96) standard deviations, yielding 1.6-2.2 W m(-2) for SMII, and 25-34:1 for PKR.

CONCLUSION

The method clearly identified the two clinical groups with no overlap of data points. The discriminant power of SMII and PKR may offer valuable diagnostic methods and monitoring tools in anaesthesia and critical care. This is the first report of normal ranges for SMII and PKR.

摘要

背景

有许多试图量化变力性(或心肌收缩力)的技术。但在麻醉和重症监护领域,尚无一种技术作为一种实用方法得到普遍认可。我们报告了一种新的变力性测定方法,作为一种床边操作,可以识别出有临床心力衰竭的患者的低变力状态。

方法

我们使用连续波多普勒超声(超声心输出量监测仪,Uscom,悉尼,澳大利亚)和即时可用的数据,估计左心室的潜能和动能。一个计算公式用于计算有效变力[Smith-Madigan 变力指数(SMII)],并针对 250 名对照组(来自术前诊所的 ASA I 患者)和 83 名急性左心室衰竭(LVF)纽约心功能协会 4 级(LVF 组)患者的历史血流动力学数据进行了测试。还研究了潜能与动能的比值(PKR)作为动脉阻抗的一种衡量标准。

结果

对照组和 LVF 组之间的心脏指数、平均(范围)有显著差异,分别为 3.37(2.84-5.32)比 1.84(1.43-2.26)升/分钟/平方米;每搏量指数(SVI)分别为 49.2(39-55)比 34.3(23-37)毫升/平方米;全身血管阻力分别为 893(644-1242)比 1960(1744-4048) dyn s cm-5;SMII 分别为 1.78(1.35-2.24)比 0.73(0.43-0.97)W m-2;PKR 分别为 29:1(24-35:1)比 124:1(96-174:1),P<0.001。SMII 和 PKR 的正常值范围计算为平均值(+/-1.96)标准差,得到 SMII 的正常值范围为 1.6-2.2 W m-2,PKR 的正常值范围为 25-34:1。

结论

该方法清楚地区分了两组临床患者,数据点无重叠。SMII 和 PKR 的判别力可能为麻醉和重症监护提供有价值的诊断方法和监测工具。这是 SMII 和 PKR 正常值范围的首次报告。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验