Haridasan Vellani, Nandan Deepak, Raju Deepak, Rajesh Gopalan Nair, Sajeev C G, Vinayakumar Desabandhu, Muneer Kader, Babu Kadangot, Krishnan M N
Govt. Medical College, Kozhikode, India.
Indian Heart J. 2013 Mar-Apr;65(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
Dysfunction of the coronary microcirculation is considered as one of the factors responsible for symptoms and abnormal stress tests in patients with angina and normal coronaries (syndrome X). We sought to evaluate the usefulness of coronary sinus filling time (CSFT) to assess coronary microcirculation in this group of patients.
We compared the CSFT of patients having definite angina or atypical angina with positive treadmill electrocardiography test (angina group), with that of patients undergoing coronary angiogram (CAG) prior to balloon mitral valvuloplasty (control group). During CAG, coronary sinus was visualized in appropriate views and CSFT in seconds was derived from frame count. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, corrected TIMI (cTIMI) frame count, TIMI Myocardial Perfusion grade (TMP) were assessed.
There were 41 patients in angina group and 16 in control group. Among the angina group 68.8% were females as against 81.8% in the control group. 87.8% (n = 36) had typical angina. Mean CSFT was 4.25 ± 0.72 s and 3.46 ± 0.99 s in the angina group and control group respectively (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to TMP (p = 0.68) & cTIMI frame count (p = 0.22).
CSFT is a simple method to assess the transit time through coronary microcirculation. CSFT was significantly delayed in patients with angina and normal coronaries. TMP and cTIMI frame count were not significantly different between groups.
冠状动脉微循环功能障碍被认为是导致心绞痛且冠状动脉正常(X综合征)患者出现症状及应激试验异常的因素之一。我们旨在评估冠状窦充盈时间(CSFT)在评估该组患者冠状动脉微循环方面的实用性。
我们将有明确心绞痛或非典型心绞痛且平板运动心电图试验阳性的患者(心绞痛组)的CSFT与在球囊二尖瓣成形术前接受冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者(对照组)的CSFT进行比较。在CAG期间,在合适的视野中观察冠状窦,并通过帧数计算得出以秒为单位的CSFT。评估心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流分级、校正的TIMI(cTIMI)帧数、TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMP)。
心绞痛组有41例患者,对照组有16例患者。心绞痛组中68.8%为女性,而对照组中这一比例为81.8%。87.8%(n = 36)有典型心绞痛。心绞痛组和对照组的平均CSFT分别为4.25±0.72秒和3.46±0.99秒(p = 0.001)。两组在TMP(p = 0.68)和cTIMI帧数(p = 0.22)方面未发现显著差异。
CSFT是一种评估通过冠状动脉微循环传输时间的简单方法。心绞痛且冠状动脉正常的患者CSFT显著延迟。两组之间TMP和cTIMI帧数无显著差异。