Puri Aniket, Bansal A, Narain V S, Sethi R, Dwivedi S K, Puri V K, Saran R K
Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Erst. King George Medical University), B-58 Sector A, Mahanagar, Lucknow, India.
Indian Heart J. 2013 Mar-Apr;65(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
The level of platelet inhibition by a Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) antagonist therapy necessary to minimize thrombotic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a subject of debate. The degree of platelet inhibition obtained 10 min after start of GpIIb/IIIa antagonist therapy predicts adverse events after PCI. The aim of this study was to look at platelet inhibition and to compare platelet GpIIb/IIIa receptors occupancy ratio (GpRO) with Eptifibatide and Tirofiban using various dose regimens and correlate with 30-day clinical outcomes in patients presenting with high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing PCI.
The patients were divided into four sub groups: (1) Eptifibatide two intracoronary bolus (180 μg/kg) alone (E(B)); or (2) two intravenous bolus (180 μg/kg) followed by infusion at 2 μg/kg/min for 24 h (E(B + Inf)); and (3) Tirofiban standard bolus dose (0.4 μg/kg) over 30 min followed by infusion at 0.1 μg/kg/min (T(Std)); or (4) at ADVANCE dose bolus (25 μg/kg) over 3 min, followed by infusion at 0.1 μg/kg/min (T(Adv)). Number of GpIIb/IIIa receptors was assessed by flow cytometry at baseline and 10 min after the bolus and percentage of free receptors was determined to calculate the GpRO. Patients were followed for 30 days for any major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
200 consecutive patients (including 74% with ST-elevation ACS) were enrolled. GpRO in groups E(B) (n = 48) and E(B + Inf) (n = 44) were 62.7% ± 27.2% and 61.4% ± 6.1% respectively while in the groups T(Std) (n = 96) and T(Adv) (n = 12) groups were 35.1% ± 17.74% and 68.8% ± 27.3% respectively. The GpRO was similar in E(B), E(B + Inf) and T(Adv) groups and was significantly higher than T(Std) group (p < 0.0001). The 30-day MACE rates in E(B) (4.2%), E(B + Inf) (4.5%) and T(Adv) (4.2%) were significantly lower than T(Std) group (12.5%) (p < 0.01).
Standard dose Tirofiban results in significantly lower rates of GpIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy ratio and this correlated with higher incidence of 30-day MACE in high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI.
在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中,为将血栓形成并发症降至最低所需的糖蛋白IIb/IIIa(GpIIb/IIIa)拮抗剂治疗的血小板抑制水平是一个有争议的话题。GpIIb/IIIa拮抗剂治疗开始10分钟后获得的血小板抑制程度可预测PCI后的不良事件。本研究的目的是观察血小板抑制情况,并使用不同剂量方案比较依替巴肽和替罗非班的血小板GpIIb/IIIa受体占有率(GpRO),并与高危急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)且接受PCI的患者30天临床结局相关联。
患者分为四个亚组:(1)单独给予依替巴肽两次冠状动脉内推注(180μg/kg)(E(B));或(2)两次静脉推注(180μg/kg),随后以2μg/kg/分钟的速度输注24小时(E(B + Inf));以及(3)替罗非班标准推注剂量(0.4μg/kg)在30分钟内推注完毕,随后以0.1μg/kg/分钟的速度输注(T(Std));或(4)以ADVANCE剂量推注(25μg/kg)在3分钟内推注完毕,随后以0.1μg/kg/分钟的速度输注(T(Adv))。在基线和推注后10分钟通过流式细胞术评估GpIIb/IIIa受体数量,并确定游离受体的百分比以计算GpRO。对患者随访30天,观察任何主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。
连续纳入200例患者(包括74%的ST段抬高型ACS患者)。E(B)组(n = 48)和E(B + Inf)组(n = 44)的GpRO分别为62.7%±27.2%和61.4%±6.1%,而T(Std)组(n = 96)和T(Adv)组(n = 12)分别为35.1%±17.74%和68.8%±27.3%。E(B)组、E(B + Inf)组和T(Adv)组的GpRO相似,且显著高于T(Std)组(p < 0.0001)。E(B)组(4.2%)、E(B + Inf)组(4.5%)和T(Adv)组(4.2%)的30天MACE发生率显著低于T(Std)组(12.5%)(p < 0.01)。
标准剂量替罗非班导致GpIIb/IIIa受体占有率显著降低,这与接受PCI的高危ACS患者30天MACE发生率较高相关。