Suppr超能文献

阿昔单抗、替罗非班或依替巴肽对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的不稳定型心绞痛患者血小板抑制的时间进程、程度及一致性。

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Kereiakes D J, Broderick T M, Roth E M, Whang D, Shimshak T, Runyon J P, Hattemer C, Schneider J, Lacock P, Mueller M, Abbottsmith C W

机构信息

Carl & Edyth Lindner Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Research, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1999 Aug 15;84(4):391-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00321-5.

Abstract

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间辅助使用血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂可减少血小板介导的不良缺血事件。尽管阿昔单抗、依替巴肽和替罗非班已获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准使用,但这些药物的药效学特征有所不同。在接受PCI的患者中,这些药物均已在随机试验中与安慰剂进行了比较,但尚未对这些药物进行随机对照研究。我们在不稳定型心绞痛患者PCI时,随机给予阿昔单抗、依替巴肽或替罗非班批准剂量方案,通过标准光透射聚集法和快速血小板功能测定法比较给药期间及给药后的体外血小板功能。与依替巴肽或阿昔单抗相比,替罗非班通过光透射聚集法观察到的血小板抑制强度降低。此外,替罗非班使用的30分钟推注策略与相对于推注开始而言最大血小板抑制的延迟起效有关。本研究中观察到的血小板功能趋势是否会转化为临床结果的差异,有待通过比较这些血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的大规模随机临床试验来确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验