Zhang Hai-ping, Ruan Li, Zheng Li-mou, Bai Dong-yu, Zhang Hai-fang, Liao Yong-qiang, Ding Yi
Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen, University, Xiamen, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;35(1):28-32. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2013.01.006.
To map the frequency and types of EGFR gene mutations present in lung cancer tissues. To evaluate the clinical applicability of a novel real-time double-loop probe PCR of which the ADx-EGFR kit is based, and to compare its performance with traditional Sanger DNA sequencing in the detection of somatic mutations of tumor genes.
A total of 208 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples were tested. Genomic DNA of the tissue samples was extracted and purified, and subjected to both traditional PCR amplification, Sanger sequencing of EGFR gene in exon 18, 19, 20, 21, and ADx's EGFR mutation detection kit. The mutation rates for EGFR gene in exon 18, 19, 20, 21, as well as the frequency of each mutation detected by the two methods, were analyzed.
The traditional Sanger DNA sequencing technique was successfully performed in 196 out of 208 (94.2%) lung cancer samples, and 22 samples (11.2%) showed EGFR gene mutations. ADx-EGFR kit was successfully used in the lung cancers of all of the 208 cases (100.0%), and 40 samples (19.2%) showed mutations. In the lung cancer samples analyzed, mutations were mainly detected in the exon 19 and exon 21 L858R point mutation, i.e. 4.8% (10/208) and 11.6% (23/208) of total mutations, respectively, and the remaining mutations were rare.
The success rate of ADx-EGFR real-time PCR for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues samples is significantly higher than that of Sanger sequencing (P < 0.01). There are significant differences between the two methods. ADx-EGFR real-time PCR shows a much higher successful detection rate and mutation rate of lung cancer tissues compared with that of Sanger sequencing. As a result, the real-time PCR with ADx-EGFR kit is proved to have a good clinical applicability and a strong advantage over the traditional Sanger DNA sequencing. It is an effective and reliable tool for clinical screening of somatic gene mutations in tumors.
确定肺癌组织中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变的频率和类型。评估基于ADx-EGFR试剂盒的新型实时双环探针PCR的临床适用性,并将其在检测肿瘤基因体细胞突变方面的性能与传统的桑格DNA测序法进行比较。
共检测了208份福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)肿瘤样本。提取并纯化组织样本的基因组DNA,对其进行传统PCR扩增、EGFR基因第18、19、20、21外显子的桑格测序以及ADx的EGFR突变检测试剂盒检测。分析EGFR基因第18、19、20、21外显子的突变率,以及两种方法检测到的每种突变的频率。
208份肺癌样本中有196份(94.2%)成功进行了传统的桑格DNA测序,22份样本(11.2%)显示EGFR基因突变。ADx-EGFR试剂盒在全部208例肺癌病例中均成功使用(100.0%),40份样本(19.2%)显示突变。在所分析的肺癌样本中,突变主要在第19外显子和第21外显子L858R点突变中检测到,分别占总突变的4.8%(10/208)和11.6%(23/208),其余突变为罕见突变。
ADx-EGFR实时PCR对福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织样本的成功率显著高于桑格测序(P<0.01)。两种方法之间存在显著差异。与桑格测序相比,ADx-EGFR实时PCR显示出更高的肺癌组织成功检测率和突变率。因此,证明使用ADx-EGFR试剂盒的实时PCR具有良好的临床适用性,且相对于传统的桑格DNA测序具有强大优势。它是临床筛查肿瘤体细胞基因突变的有效且可靠的工具。