Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH, 5600 Nathan Shock Dr., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013 Sep;62:80-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.026. Epub 2013 May 5.
Beneficial clinical bradycardic effects of ivabradine (IVA) have been interpreted solely on the basis of If inhibition, because IVA specifically inhibits If in sinoatrial nodal pacemaker cells (SANC). However, it has been recently hypothesized that SANC normal automaticity is regulated by crosstalk between an "M clock," the ensemble of surface membrane ion channels, and a "Ca(2+) clock," the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). We tested the hypothesis that crosstalk between the two clocks regulates SANC automaticity, and that indirect suppression of the Ca(2+) clock further contributes to IVA-induced bradycardia. IVA (3 μM) not only reduced If amplitude by 45 ± 6% in isolated rabbit SANC, but the IVA-induced slowing of the action potential (AP) firing rate was accompanied by reduced SR Ca(2+) load, slowed intracellular Ca(2+) cycling kinetics, and prolonged the period of spontaneous local Ca(2+) releases (LCRs) occurring during diastolic depolarization. Direct and specific inhibition of SERCA2 by cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) had effects similar to IVA on LCR period and AP cycle length. Specifically, the LCR period and AP cycle length shift toward longer times almost equally by either direct perturbations of the M clock (IVA) or the Ca(2+) clock (CPA), indicating that the LCR period reports the crosstalk between the clocks. Our numerical model simulations predict that entrainment between the two clocks that involves a reduction in INCX during diastolic depolarization is required to explain the experimentally AP firing rate reduction by IVA. In summary, our study provides new evidence that a coupled-clock system regulates normal cardiac pacemaker cell automaticity. Thus, IVA-induced bradycardia includes a suppression of both clocks within this system.
伊伐布雷定(IVA)的有益临床心动过缓作用仅基于 If 抑制来解释,因为伊伐布雷定特异性抑制窦房结起搏细胞(SANC)中的 If。然而,最近有人假设,SANC 的正常自动性是由“M 钟”(细胞膜离子通道的总体)和“Ca(2+)钟”(肌浆网)之间的串扰调节的。我们检验了以下假设:两个钟之间的串扰调节 SANC 的自动性,而间接抑制 Ca(2+)钟进一步导致 IVA 诱导的心动过缓。IVA(3 μM)不仅使分离的兔 SANC 中的 If 幅度降低了 45±6%,而且 IVA 诱导的动作电位(AP)发放率减慢伴随着 SR Ca(2+)负荷减少、细胞内 Ca(2+)循环动力学减慢和舒张期去极化期间自发局部 Ca(2+)释放(LCR)的周期延长。环匹阿尼酸(CPA)直接和特异性抑制 SERCA2 的作用类似于 IVA 对 LCR 周期和 AP 周期长度的影响。具体而言,通过直接干扰 M 钟(IVA)或 Ca(2+)钟(CPA),LCR 周期和 AP 周期长度几乎同时向更长时间移动,表明 LCR 周期报告了两个钟之间的串扰。我们的数值模型模拟预测,涉及舒张期去极化期间 INCX 减少的两个钟之间的同步是解释 IVA 实验性 AP 发放率降低所必需的。总之,我们的研究提供了新的证据,表明一个耦合钟系统调节正常心脏起搏细胞的自动性。因此,IVA 诱导的心动过缓包括该系统内两个钟的抑制。