The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Caries Res. 2013;47(5):406-13. doi: 10.1159/000349911. Epub 2013 May 3.
To evaluate caries prevalence in non-syndromic patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) in comparison with a matched non-CLP population.
A literature search was conducted in order to identify articles reporting on the prevalence of caries in CLP versus non-CLP individuals. The related citations function in PubMed and reference lists of retrieved articles were used to expand the search. Only studies with a suitable matched control group were included. From each included study, study and sample characteristics were extracted, as were results. The main outcome was the score given for caries prevalence in each study, using a well-defined index. The data were entered into meta-analysis software and a meta-analysis performed using the random-effects model.
From the 592 articles initially identified, 7 were chosen according to preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. All of the studies were cross-sectional in nature, and used the decayed, missing, and filled (DMF/dmf) indices as the final outcomes. The included studies involved a total of 474 CLP patients aged 1.5-29 years. When looking at permanent teeth, data from 5 studies suggest that CLP patients have a higher number of DMF teeth than the controls (mean difference 1.38; p = 0.003). For deciduous teeth, data from 4 studies suggest that CLP patients have a higher number of dmf teeth than the controls (mean difference 1.51; p = 0.03).
Non-syndromic patients with CLP tend to have higher caries prevalence, both in the permanent and the deciduous dentition, in comparison with matched non-CLP controls.
评估唇腭裂(CLP)非综合征患者的龋齿患病率,并与匹配的非 CLP 人群进行比较。
进行文献检索,以确定报告 CLP 与非 CLP 个体龋齿患病率的文章。使用 PubMed 的相关引文功能和检索文章的参考文献列表来扩展搜索。仅纳入具有合适匹配对照组的研究。从每个纳入的研究中,提取研究和样本特征以及结果。主要结局是使用明确定义的指数对每个研究的龋齿患病率评分。将数据输入到荟萃分析软件中,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
从最初确定的 592 篇文章中,根据预设的纳入和排除标准选择了 7 篇文章。所有研究均为横断面研究,使用龋失补牙数(DMF/dmf)指数作为最终结局。纳入的研究共涉及 474 名年龄在 1.5-29 岁的 CLP 患者。在观察恒牙时,5 项研究的数据表明 CLP 患者的 DMF 牙数多于对照组(平均差异 1.38;p = 0.003)。对于乳牙,4 项研究的数据表明 CLP 患者的 dmf 牙数多于对照组(平均差异 1.51;p = 0.03)。
与匹配的非 CLP 对照组相比,非综合征型唇腭裂患者的恒牙和乳牙龋齿患病率均较高。