Nakayama Yoshie, Ito Yoshinori, Tanabe Masahiko, Takahashi Shunji, Hatake Kiyohiko
Medical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan,
Breast Cancer. 2015 Mar;22(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0472-4. Epub 2013 May 8.
Chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer containing anthracycline and cyclophosphamide are classified as highly emetogenic. Aprepitant (A), palonosetron (P), granisetron (G), or dexamethasone (D) are recommended antiemetic drugs. However, it is uncertain which combination is most effective. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of these antiemetic drugs.
We reviewed the medical records of 454 patients with breast cancer treated in our facility with regimens containing anthracycline and cyclophosphamide between August 2009 and September 2010.
The number of patients treated with GD, AGD, and APD was 147, 150, and 157, respectively. Complete response (CR) in the acute (0-24 h) and delayed (24-120 h) phases was 68.7 and 76.2 %, respectively, for GD, 90.0 and 92.7 %, respectively, for AGD, and 89.8 and 90.4 %, respectively, for APD. Complete control (CC) in the acute and delayed phases for each regimen was 60.5 and 64.6 %, respectively, for GD, 62.7 and 88.7 %, respectively, for AGD, and 84.1 and 87.3 %, respectively, for APD. In the acute and delayed phases CR for AGD or APD was significantly superior to that for GD (P < 0.01). It worth noting that CC for APD in the acute phase was significantly superior to that for AGD (P < 0.01). In the delayed phase CC for AGD or APD was significantly superior to that for GD.
A combination of aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone is an antiemetic treatment of choice for patients treated with regimens containing anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.
含蒽环类药物和环磷酰胺的乳腺癌化疗方案被归类为高度致吐性方案。阿瑞匹坦(A)、帕洛诺司琼(P)、格拉司琼(G)或地塞米松(D)是推荐使用的止吐药物。然而,尚不确定哪种联合用药最为有效。我们回顾性研究了这些止吐药物的疗效。
我们回顾了2009年8月至2010年9月间在我院接受含蒽环类药物和环磷酰胺方案治疗的454例乳腺癌患者的病历。
接受GD、AGD和APD治疗的患者人数分别为147例、150例和157例。GD方案在急性期(0 - 24小时)和延迟期(24 - 120小时)的完全缓解(CR)率分别为68.7%和76.2%,AGD方案分别为90.0%和92.7%,APD方案分别为89.8%和90.4%。各方案在急性期和延迟期的完全控制(CC)率,GD方案分别为60.5%和64.6%,AGD方案分别为62.7%和88.7%,APD方案分别为84.1%和87.3%。在急性期和延迟期,AGD或APD方案的CR率显著高于GD方案(P < 0.01)。值得注意的是,APD方案在急性期的CC率显著高于AGD方案(P < 0.01)。在延迟期,AGD或APD方案的CC率显著高于GD方案。
对于接受含蒽环类药物和环磷酰胺方案治疗的患者,阿瑞匹坦、帕洛诺司琼和地塞米松联合用药是止吐治疗的首选。