Hueston W D, Hoblet K H, Miller G Y, Eastridge M L
Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Jun 15;196(12):1956-61.
A telephone survey was conducted of 50 randomly selected Ohio-licensed veterinarians engaged in dairy practice. The survey's purpose was to determine the extent of mastitis control services offered by practitioners and to assess their utilization of milk somatic cell count (SCC) data on individual cows available from the Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA). During the preceding year, 96% (48/50) of practitioners surveyed had performed bacteriologic culture of milk samples. Practitioners were twice as likely to have performed culture on milk from mastitic cows that failed to respond to treatment as they were to have performed culture for purposes of identifying pathogen trends within a herd. Veterinarians in predominantly dairy practices were more likely to have completed bacteriologic examination of milk in their own laboratories than were veterinarians who were engaged in less than 50% dairy practice (P = 0.016). Most veterinarians (83%) reported that coagulase test results were available or that Staphylococcus aureus was differentiated from other staphylococcal species. Streptococcus agalactiae was not differentiated from other streptococcal species by 35% of practitioners surveyed. For veterinarians with clients enrolled in the DHIA, 91% (43/47) reported looking at, discussing, or otherwise using the DHIA records. Eighty-one percent (35/43) of veterinarians who had clients using services from the DHIA reported that clients also received individual cow milk SCC results. Veterinarians engaged in predominantly, dairy practice expressed a greater familiarity with the linear score method of SCC reporting than did veterinarians whose practices were less than 50% dairy (P = 0.085); however, both groups reported a preference for raw SCC data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对50名随机挑选的俄亥俄州持牌从事奶牛医疗业务的兽医进行了电话调查。该调查的目的是确定从业者提供的乳腺炎控制服务范围,并评估他们对奶牛个体乳体细胞计数(SCC)数据的利用情况,这些数据可从奶牛改良协会(DHIA)获取。在前一年,96%(48/50)的受访从业者对牛奶样本进行了细菌培养。从业者对治疗无反应的患乳腺炎奶牛的牛奶进行培养的可能性是为确定牛群内病原体趋势而进行培养的两倍。主要从事奶牛医疗业务的兽医比从事奶牛医疗业务少于50%的兽医更有可能在自己的实验室完成牛奶的细菌学检查(P = 0.016)。大多数兽医(83%)报告说有凝固酶检测结果,或者能区分金黄色葡萄球菌和其他葡萄球菌种类。35%的受访从业者无法区分无乳链球菌和其他链球菌种类。对于有客户加入DHIA的兽医,91%(43/47)报告查看、讨论或以其他方式使用了DHIA记录。有客户使用DHIA服务报告说客户也收到了个体奶牛SCC结果。主要从事奶牛医疗业务的兽医比从事奶牛医疗业务少于50% 的兽医对SCC报告线性评分方法更熟悉(P = 0.085);然而,两组都表示更喜欢原始SCC数据。(摘要截于250字)