Zillmann Teresa, Knechtle Beat, Rüst Christoph Alexander, Knechtle Patrizia, Rosemann Thomas, Lepers Romuald
Institute for General Practice and for Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Chin J Physiol. 2013 Jun 30;56(3):138-46. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2013.BAB105.
Participation in endurance running such as half-marathon (21-km) and marathon (42-km) has increased over the last decades. We compared 147 recreational male half-marathoners and 126 recreational male marathoners to investigate similarities or differences in their anthropometric and training characteristics. The half-marathoners were heavier (P < 0.05), had longer legs (P < 0.001), thicker upper arms (P < 0.05), a thicker thigh (P < 0.01), a higher sum of skinfold thicknesses (P < 0.01), a higher body fat percentage (P < 0.05) and a higher skeletal muscle mass (P < 0.05) than the marathoners. They had fewer years of experience (P < 0.05), completed fewer weekly training kilometers (P < 0.001), and fewer weekly running hours (P < 0.01) compared to the marathoners. For half-marathoners, body mass index (P = 0.011), percent body fat (P = 0.036) and speed in running during training (P < 0.0001) were related to race time (r2 = 0.47). For marathoners, percent body fat (P = 0.001) and speed in running during training (P < 0.0001) were associated to race time (r2 = 0.47). When body mass index was excluded for the half-marathoners in the multi-variate analysis, r2 decreased to 0.45, therefore body mass index explained only 2% of the variance of half-marathon performance. Percent body fat was significantly and negatively related to running speed during training in both groups. To summarize, half-marathoners showed differences in both anthropometry and training characteristics compared to marathoners that could be related to their lower training volume, most probably due to the shorter race distance they intended to compete. Both groups of athletes seemed to profit from low body fat and a high running speed during training for fast race times.
在过去几十年中,参与半程马拉松(21公里)和马拉松(42公里)等耐力跑的人数有所增加。我们比较了147名男性业余半程马拉松运动员和126名男性业余马拉松运动员,以研究他们在人体测量学和训练特征方面的异同。与马拉松运动员相比,半程马拉松运动员体重更重(P < 0.05)、腿更长(P < 0.001)、上臂更粗(P < 0.05)、大腿更粗(P < 0.01)、皮褶厚度总和更高(P < 0.01)、体脂百分比更高(P < 0.05)以及骨骼肌质量更高(P < 0.05)。与马拉松运动员相比,他们的经验年限更少(P < 0.05)、每周训练公里数更少(P < 0.001)以及每周跑步小时数更少(P < 0.01)。对于半程马拉松运动员,体重指数(P = 0.011)、体脂百分比(P = 0.036)和训练期间的跑步速度(P < 0.0001)与比赛时间相关(r2 = 0.47)。对于马拉松运动员,体脂百分比(P = 0.001)和训练期间的跑步速度(P < 0.0001)与比赛时间相关(r2 = 0.47)。在多变量分析中,当排除半程马拉松运动员的体重指数时,r2降至0.45,因此体重指数仅解释了半程马拉松成绩方差的2%。两组运动员的体脂百分比均与训练期间的跑步速度呈显著负相关。总之,与马拉松运动员相比,半程马拉松运动员在人体测量学和训练特征方面均存在差异,这可能与他们较低的训练量有关,很可能是由于他们打算参加的比赛距离较短。两组运动员似乎都受益于低体脂和训练期间的高跑步速度,从而获得较快的比赛成绩。