Department of Psychology and Human Development, and Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
J Neurosci. 2013 May 8;33(19):8243-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1608-12.2013.
Atypical perceptual processing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is well documented. In addition, growing evidence supports the hypothesis that an excitatory/inhibitory neurochemical imbalance might underlie ASD. Here we investigated putative behavioral consequences of the excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in the context of visual motion perception. As stimulus size increases, typical observers exhibit marked impairments in perceiving motion of high-contrast stimuli. This result, termed "spatial suppression," is believed to reflect inhibitory motion-processing mechanisms. Motion processing is also affected by gain control, an inhibitory mechanism that underlies saturation of neural responses at high contrast. Motivated by these behavioral correlates of inhibitory function, we investigated motion perception in human children with ASD (n = 20) and typical development (n = 26). At high contrast, both groups exhibited similar impairments in motion perception with increasing stimulus size, revealing no apparent differences in spatial suppression. However, there was a substantial enhancement of motion perception in ASD: children with ASD exhibited a consistent twofold improvement in perceiving motion. Hypothesizing that this enhancement might indicate abnormal weakening of response gain control, we repeated our measurements at low contrast, where the effects of gain control should be negligible. At low contrast, we indeed found no group differences in motion discrimination thresholds. These low-contrast results, however, revealed weaker spatial suppression in ASD, suggesting the possibility that gain control abnormalities in ASD might have masked spatial suppression differences at high contrast. Overall, we report a pattern of motion perception abnormalities in ASD that includes substantial enhancements at high contrast and is consistent with an underlying excitatory/inhibitory imbalance.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中存在异常的知觉加工,这一点已有充分的文献记载。此外,越来越多的证据支持兴奋性/抑制性神经化学失衡可能是 ASD 的基础这一假说。在这里,我们研究了视觉运动知觉背景下兴奋性/抑制性失衡的潜在行为后果。随着刺激大小的增加,典型观察者在感知高对比度刺激的运动时会出现明显的障碍。这种结果被称为“空间抑制”,被认为反映了抑制性运动处理机制。运动处理也受到增益控制的影响,增益控制是一种抑制机制,它导致高对比度下神经反应的饱和。受这些抑制功能的行为相关性的启发,我们研究了 ASD 儿童(n = 20)和典型发育儿童(n = 26)的运动知觉。在高对比度下,两组在随着刺激大小增加的运动感知中都表现出相似的障碍,表明在空间抑制方面没有明显差异。然而,ASD 中存在运动知觉的显著增强:ASD 儿童在感知运动方面表现出一致的两倍改善。假设这种增强可能表明反应增益控制异常减弱,我们在低对比度下重复了我们的测量,在低对比度下,增益控制的影响应该可以忽略不计。在低对比度下,我们确实没有发现运动辨别阈值的组间差异。然而,这些低对比度的结果显示出 ASD 中较弱的空间抑制,这表明 ASD 中增益控制异常可能掩盖了高对比度下的空间抑制差异。总的来说,我们报告了 ASD 中运动知觉异常的模式,包括高对比度下的显著增强,这与潜在的兴奋性/抑制性失衡一致。