Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-0201, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jul;91(7):3211-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5606. Epub 2013 May 8.
A total of 1104 barrows and gilts (PIC 337 × 1050, Pig Improvement Company, Hendersonville, TN), weighing 36 ± 1 kg were used in a 109-d study to evaluate effects of dietary L-carnitine and dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) on growth, carcass traits, and loin and fat quality. Pigs were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatments, with 7 pens per treatment. Treatments were arranged as a 2 × 3 factorial, with main effects of DDGS (30% in Phases 1, 2, and 3, and 20% in Phase 4) and L-carnitine (0, 50, or 100 mg/kg). Overall (d 0 to 109), dietary L-carnitine tended to improve ADG (linear, P = 0.07). Pigs fed 50 mg/kg L-carnitine but no DDGS had greater G:F than pigs fed 0 or 100 mg/kg, whereas when diets containing DDGS were fed, 50 mg/kg of L-carnitine reduced G:F compared with pigs fed 0 or 100 mg/kg (quadratic DDGS × L-carnitine, P < 0.01). There was no effect of DDGS × L-carnitine for any carcass traits, but pigs fed increasing dietary inclusion levels of L-carnitine produced heavier HCW (quadratic, P = 0.03), greater carcass yields (quadratic, P = 0.07), and greater fat depths (quadratic, P = 0.04), with the greatest response observed in pigs fed 50 mg/kg dietary L-carnitine. Feeding L-carnitine increased purge loss (linear, P = 0.03), whereas feeding DDGS tended to decrease (P = 0.06) LM marbling scores. The LM from pigs fed 50 mg/kg L-carnitine and DDGS had lower shear force values compared with LM chops from pigs fed either 0 or 100 mg/kg; however, shear force values were similar across dietary L-carnitine levels in diets devoid of DDGS (quadratic DDGS × L-carnitine, P < 0.01). Furthermore, increasing L-carnitine in DDGS diets increased fresh LM color scores, but pigs fed DDGS-free diets produced LM chops with similar subjective color scores (linear DDGS × L-carnitine, P = 0.03). As expected, feeding DDGS increased (P < 0.001) iodine value (IV) in jowl fat samples, but dietary L-carnitine did not alter IV. The concentrations of C18:2n-6 and C20:2 were decreased with increasing L-carnitine in DDGS-containing diets, but not in diets without DDGS (linear DDGS × L-carnitine, P ≤ 0.04). Results of this study indicate that dietary DDGS did not affect growth, but led to more unsaturation of jowl fat, whereas feeding 50 mg/kg of L-carnitine improved HCW and reduced C18:2n-6 in jowl fat when fed in combination with DDGS.
本研究旨在评估日粮中添加左旋肉碱和干酒糟及其可溶物(DDGS)对生长性能、胴体性状和腰肉及脂肪品质的影响,选用 PIC 337 × 1050(Pig Improvement Company,Hendersonville,TN)品种 1104 头公猪和母猪(体重 36±1kg),进行为期 109d 的试验。猪只按初始体重进行分组,随机分配至 6 种处理组之一,每个处理组设 7 个重复。试验采用 2×3 因子设计,DDGS(1、2、3 阶段添加 30%,第 4 阶段添加 20%)和左旋肉碱(0、50 或 100mg/kg)为两个主效因子。总体(d0 至 109),日粮添加左旋肉碱可提高 ADG(线性,P=0.07)。与添加 0 或 100mg/kg 左旋肉碱相比,添加 50mg/kg 左旋肉碱且不添加 DDGS 的猪只具有更高的饲料增重比(G:F),但添加 DDGS 时,添加 50mg/kg 左旋肉碱的猪只 G:F 比添加 0 或 100mg/kg 左旋肉碱的猪只低(DDGS×左旋肉碱的二次效应,P<0.01)。DDGS 和左旋肉碱对任何胴体性状均无互作效应,但随着日粮中左旋肉碱添加水平的增加,猪只的宰前活重(HCW)(二次,P=0.03)、胴体产率(二次,P=0.07)和脂肪厚度(二次,P=0.04)增加,其中添加 50mg/kg 左旋肉碱的效果最显著。添加左旋肉碱可增加腹脂损失(线性,P=0.03),而添加 DDGS 则有降低趋势(P=0.06)。与添加 0 或 100mg/kg 左旋肉碱的猪只相比,添加 50mg/kg 左旋肉碱和 DDGS 的猪只腰肉的剪切力值较低;但在不添加 DDGS 的日粮中,日粮中左旋肉碱水平的变化对剪切力值没有影响(DDGS×左旋肉碱的二次效应,P<0.01)。此外,DDGS 日粮中添加左旋肉碱可提高腰肉的新鲜颜色评分,但不添加 DDGS 的日粮中,猪只腰肉的颜色评分相似(DDGS×左旋肉碱的线性效应,P=0.03)。如预期的那样,添加 DDGS 会增加(P<0.001)颈肉脂肪样本的碘值(IV),但日粮中添加左旋肉碱不会改变 IV。在含有 DDGS 的日粮中,随着日粮中左旋肉碱添加水平的增加,C18:2n-6 和 C20:2 的浓度降低,但在不含有 DDGS 的日粮中则没有这种情况(DDGS×左旋肉碱的线性效应,P≤0.04)。本研究结果表明,日粮中添加 DDGS 不会影响生长性能,但会增加颈肉脂肪的不饱和度,而添加 50mg/kg 左旋肉碱可与 DDGS 联合使用,提高 HCW,降低颈肉脂肪中的 C18:2n-6。