Simple screening statistical tools to detect reporting bias: when should we ask for raw data?
作者信息
Pirracchio Romain, Resche-Rigon Matthieu, Chevret Sylvie, Journois Didier
出版信息
Crit Care. 2013 May 7;17(3):142. doi: 10.1186/cc12611.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Simple screening statistical tools to detect reporting bias: when should we ask for raw data?用于检测报告偏倚的简单筛查统计工具：我们何时应该索要原始数据？
Crit Care. 2013 May 7;17(3):142. doi: 10.1186/cc12611.
2
Are triallists guilty of 'imbalanced salami slicing'- by favouring positive results in secondary publications?试验者是否因在二次发表中偏袒阳性结果而犯有“不均衡切香肠”的过错？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.005.
3
The paradox of statistical power and publication bias.
Health Psychol. 2001 Sep;20(5):393. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.20.5.393a.
4
The bias busters.偏见破除者。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4748.
5
Biased reporting in surgery.外科手术中的倾向性报告
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):591-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9499.
6
Publication of null results.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;53(6):677. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:248-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Statistical reporting and table construction guidelines for publication in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia.《加拿大麻醉学杂志》发表文章的统计报告与表格制作指南
Can J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;65(2):152-161. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-1024-8. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.报告研究结果：改善沟通的建议。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;41(4):561-4. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.135.
10
Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.同行评审与生物医学出版研究：推动提高报告质量的探索
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362.
引用本文的文献
1
Do simple screening statistical tools help to detect reporting bias?简单的筛查统计工具有助于发现报告偏倚吗？
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Sep 2;3(1):29. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-29.
本文引用的文献
1
Notice of retraction.撤稿通知。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1567. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182040b99.
2
The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysis.随机对照试验证据的价值取决于统计分析的质量。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):270-81. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
3
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.从最佳证据到最佳实践：有效实施患者护理变革。
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
4
The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.生物统计学在临床试验中欺诈行为的预防、检测和处理中的作用。
Stat Med. 1999 Dec 30;18(24):3435-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991230)18:24<3435::aid-sim365>3.0.co;2-o.
5
Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.医生为何不遵循临床实践指南？一个改进框架。
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.
6
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。CONSORT声明。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637.
Zotero 插件