Division of Bone Diseases, University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bone. 2013 Aug;55(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.04.025. Epub 2013 May 6.
The objective of this study is to determine in healthy premenopausal women with a history of fracture which bone structural components of the distal radius are the most closely associated with a risk of fracture.
The method was as follows: measurement of radial areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by DXA, microstructural components by high-resolution quantitative peripheral computerized tomography (HR-pQCT) and strength variables by micro Finite Element Analysis (μFEA) in 196 healthy premenopausal women aged 45.9 ± 3.7 (± SD) years with (FX, n = 96) and without (NO-FX, n = 100) a history of fracture. We evaluated differences in T-scores between FX and NO-FX and risk of fracture by Odds ratios (OR with 95% confidence intervals, CI) per one SD decrease, using logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, height, weight, menarcheal age, calcium and protein intakes, and physical activity.
In the whole group the mean radial metaphysis aBMD T-score was not significantly different from zero. In the FX as compared to the NO-FX group, the differences in T-scores were as follows: for radial metaphysis: aBMD, -0.24 (P = 0.005); for distal radius microstructure components: cortical volumetric BMD, -0.38 (P = 0.0009); cortical thickness, -0.37 (P = 0.0001); cross-sectional area (CSA), +0.24 (P=0.034); and endosteal perimeter, +0.28 (P = 0.032); and for strength estimates: stiffness, -0.15 (P = 0.030); failure load, -0.14 (P = 0.044); and apparent modulus, -0.28 (P = 0.006). T-scores of trabecular volumetric BMD and thickness did not significantly differ between the FX and the NO-FX group. Accordingly, the risk of fracture (OR, 95% CI) for 1 SD decrease in radius bone parameters was as follows: radial metaphysis aBMD: 1.70 (1.18-2.44), P = 0.004; cortical volumetric BMD: 1.86 (1.28-2.71), P = 0.001; and cortical thickness: 2.36 (1.53-3.63), P = 0.0001. The corresponding fracture risk for the strength estimates was as follows: stiffness: 1.66 (1.06-2.61), P = 0.028; failure load: 1.59 (1.02-2.47), P = 0.041; and apparent modulus: 1.76 (1.17-2.64), P = 0.006.
In healthy premenopausal women, a history of fracture is associated with reduced T-scores in the distal radius, with the cortical components showing the greatest deficit. A reduction of one SD in cortical thickness is associated with a nearly three-fold increased risk of fracture. This finding strengthens the notion that, in healthy women, a certain degree of bone structural fragility contributes to fractures before the menopause and therefore should be taken into consideration in the individual prevention strategy of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
本研究旨在确定在有骨折史的健康绝经前女性中,哪些桡骨远端骨结构成分与骨折风险最密切相关。
方法如下:通过 DXA 测量桡骨的骨面积密度(aBMD),通过高分辨率定量外周计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)测量微观结构成分,通过微有限元分析(μFEA)测量强度变量,共纳入 196 名年龄 45.9 ± 3.7(± SD)岁、有(FX,n=96)和无(NO-FX,n=100)骨折史的健康绝经前女性。我们评估了 FX 和 NO-FX 之间 T 评分的差异,并使用逻辑回归分析,根据年龄、身高、体重、初潮年龄、钙和蛋白质摄入量以及体力活动进行调整,评估了 T 评分每降低一个标准差与骨折风险的比值比(OR 和 95%置信区间,CI)。
在整个组中,桡骨骨干的平均桡骨 aBMD T 评分与零没有显著差异。与 NO-FX 组相比,FX 组的 T 评分差异如下:桡骨骨干:aBMD,-0.24(P=0.005);远端桡骨微观结构成分:皮质体积 BMD,-0.38(P=0.0009);皮质厚度,-0.37(P=0.0001);横截面积(CSA),+0.24(P=0.034);和内表面周长,+0.28(P=0.032);以及强度估计值:刚度,-0.15(P=0.030);失效载荷,-0.14(P=0.044);和表观模量,-0.28(P=0.006)。FX 和 NO-FX 组之间桡骨骨干的骨小梁体积 BMD 和厚度的 T 评分没有显著差异。因此,桡骨骨参数每降低一个标准差与骨折风险的比值比(OR,95%CI)如下:桡骨骨干 aBMD:1.70(1.18-2.44),P=0.004;皮质体积 BMD:1.86(1.28-2.71),P=0.001;和皮质厚度:2.36(1.53-3.63),P=0.0001。相应的强度估计值的骨折风险如下:刚度:1.66(1.06-2.61),P=0.028;失效载荷:1.59(1.02-2.47),P=0.041;和表观模量:1.76(1.17-2.64),P=0.006。
在健康的绝经前女性中,骨折史与桡骨远端 T 评分降低有关,其中皮质成分的缺陷最大。皮质厚度降低一个标准差与骨折风险增加近三倍相关。这一发现强化了这样一种观点,即在健康女性中,一定程度的骨结构脆弱性导致绝经前骨折,因此应在绝经后骨质疏松症的个体预防策略中加以考虑。